MSI FM2-A55M-E33 (MS-7721)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7721
MotherboardMSI FM2-A55M-E33 (MS-7721)  (all builds)
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130319
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 03 '19 at 08:34
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Memory 83.7
1-Core 69.4
2-Core 132
59% 95 Pts
4-Core 211
8-Core 209
28% 210 Pts
64-Core 209
13% 209 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Nvidia(10DE 013B) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
4.88% Terrible
Lighting 5.67
Reflection 5.54
Parallax 6.88
5% 6.03 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 7.27
Splatting 7.17
5% 6.45 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.88%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 97 58 61 57 34 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.4% Below average
Read 220
Write 203
Mixed 80.5
SusWrite 74.1
32% 144 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 41.2
4K Mixed 8.8
66% 23.9 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 91.1
88% 139 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 82%
External USB3.0 DISK02 4TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0 0.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
6.03% Terrible
Read 24.8
Write 24.8
Mixed 23
SusWrite 0.2
23% 18.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.3
38% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 6.03%
Great: 66%
External USB3.0 DISK03 4TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.3 3.2 3.2 3.4 3 3.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
6.88% Terrible
Read 26
Write 25
Mixed 24.2
SusWrite 3.2
25% 19.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.3
38% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 6.88%
Great: 80%
External USB3.0 DISK01 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Read 27.7
Write 24.5
Mixed 20.5
SusWrite 3.9
24% 19.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 70%
External USB3.0 DISK04 1TB
122GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 24 24 24 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 29
Write 26.2
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 23.8
34% 25.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
95% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 667 MHz clocked @ 4 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.5% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 4.5
MC Mixed 7
20% 6.93 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 8.5
23% 8.03 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2-A55M-E33 (MS-7721) Builds (Compare 255 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI FM2-A55M-E33 (MS-7721) - $155

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $242
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback