Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z590 UD AC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics155% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive342% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z590 UD AC  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220124
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 25 '22 at 04:17
Run Duration437 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 55%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900K-$270
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Memory 56.4
1-Core 155
2-Core 286
86% 166 Pts
4-Core 516
8-Core 908
86% 712 Pts
64-Core 1,225
76% 1,225 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400
Asus(1043 87BC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
155% Outstanding
Lighting 231
Reflection 216
Parallax 206
188% 218 fps
MRender 193
Gravity 161
Splatting 142
133% 165 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 155%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$109
677GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1194 1790 2141 2096 1946 1877 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
342% Outstanding
Read 2,083
Write 2035
Mixed 2,075
SusWrite 1,841
453% 2,009 MB/s
4K Read 59.7
4K Write 149
4K Mixed 88.7
283% 99.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,496
DQ Write 1,110
DQ Mixed 1,256
952% 1,288 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 342%
Great: 477%
ST14000NM001G-2KJ103 14TB
10.5TB free
Firmware: SN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 245 245 246 258 251 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.1% Below average
Read 203
Write 220
Mixed 106
SusWrite 249
44% 195 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 10.7
4K Mixed 1.2
30% 9.07 MB/s
DQ Read 12.8
DQ Write 11
DQ Mixed 0.5
4% 8.1 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 58%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K3000 3TB-$60
380GB free
Firmware: MKAOA3B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 76 82 82 82 82 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 128
Write 138
Mixed 75.8
SusWrite 81.2
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
173% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 87%
Seagate Desktop HDD 6TB (2014)-$220
24GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 112 119 112 114 132 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 107
Write 104
Mixed 67.4
SusWrite 118
73% 99.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
184% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 118%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$75
372GB free
Firmware: CC52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 138 138 135 135 135 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
75.4% Very good
Read 126
Write 132
Mixed 70
SusWrite 137
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 96%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$80
724GB free
Firmware: MN6OA180
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 132 132 134 129 131 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 126
Write 126
Mixed 63.6
SusWrite 132
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
168% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 85%
Amd-raid ST14000NM001G-2K 14TB
7TB free
Firmware: SN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 226 224 224 221 225 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 209
Write 188
Mixed 95.7
SusWrite 224
131% 179 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 1.2
901% 7.3 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 126%
Great: 138%
WD Elements 25A3 10TB
517GB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 127 135 132 124 131 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 182
Write 191
Mixed 101
SusWrite 128
199% 151 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1.1
208% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 95%
WD Elements 25A3 12TB
4TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 79 75 67 79 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
46.3% Average
Read 92.6
Write 132
Mixed 87.4
SusWrite 74.6
133% 96.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.4
234% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 100%
External USB3.0 DISK02 1TB
931GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 30 40 41 34 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
18% Very poor
Read 33.8
Write 31.1
Mixed 16.4
SusWrite 35.8
39% 29.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.4
72% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18%
Great: 70%
WD My Passport 0827 3TB
309GB free, PID 0827
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 85 86 86 88 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
37% Below average
Read 91.2
Write 101
Mixed 96.5
SusWrite 86.9
130% 93.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
82% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 37%
Great: 49%
External USB3.0 DISK01 1TB
931GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 21 21 20 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Read 31.9
Write 30.5
Mixed 28.4
SusWrite 21.3
38% 28 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
83% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 67%
WD My Passport 0827 3TB
604GB free, PID 0827
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 83 84 83 82 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 101
Write 99
Mixed 72.6
SusWrite 82.7
119% 88.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
99% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 49%
WD My Passport 0827 3TB
330GB free, PID 0827
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 65 64 64 65 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
28.3% Poor
Read 67.7
Write 71.1
Mixed 78.2
SusWrite 64.1
97% 70.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
75% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 49%
WD Elements 25A3 14TB
109GB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 96 89 94 94 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 107
Write 111
Mixed 134
SusWrite 93.4
154% 111 MB/s
4K Read 8.2
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 3.3
268% 5.07 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 103%
External USB3.0 DISK00 2TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
5.25% Terrible
Read 27.1
Write 27.9
Mixed 13.5
SusWrite 0
21% 17.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
25% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 5.25%
Great: 68%
External USB3.0 DISK03 2TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 27
Write 13.2
Mixed 17.4
22% 19.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 80%
External USB3.0 DISK04 1TB
931GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 21 21 20 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Read 30.7
Write 22.9
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 20
31% 24 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
86% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 67%
WD My Book 25EE 6TB
2.5TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 137 137 139 137 138 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 127
Write 130
Mixed 88.9
SusWrite 138
165% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
116% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-4000C18-8GTZRB 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
52.1% Above average
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 16.7
58% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 9.9
27% 9.6 GB/s
Latency 139
29% 139 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z590 UD AC Builds (Compare 6,797 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z590 UD AC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $672
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback