Today's hottest deals

MSI H97 GAMING 3 (MS-7918)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7918
MotherboardMSI H97 GAMING 3 (MS-7918)  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141224
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMar 18 '20 at 17:51
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$115
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Memory 91
1-Core 109
2-Core 209
79% 137 Pts
4-Core 365
8-Core 562
57% 463 Pts
64-Core 567
35% 567 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$144
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 442.59
Performing below potential (98th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (70 fps cap detected)
56.4% Above average
Lighting 69.1
Reflection 69.6
Parallax 60.5
56% 66.4 fps
MRender 69.9
Gravity 66
Splatting 70.8
57% 68.9 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor M6S 256GB-$37
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 329 387 348 393 403 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Read 450
Write 377
Mixed 277
SusWrite 374
83% 369 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 71.9
4K Mixed 34.6
129% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 207
186% 282 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 104%
External USB3.0 DISK00 1TB
109GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 158 157 161 162 159 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 173
Write 164
Mixed 132
SusWrite 159
212% 157 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
134% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 74%
External USB3.0 DISK02 1TB
334GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 5.8 2.5 3.2 2 1.5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
27.2% Poor
Read 128
Write 136
Mixed 108
SusWrite 3.1
121% 94 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
128% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 70%
External USB3.0 DISK01 1TB
559GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 155 156 159 161 161 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 169
Write 162
Mixed 126
SusWrite 158
207% 154 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
138% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 67%
External USB3.0 DISK03 1TB
294GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 3.4 1.4 1.4 1.1 14 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
24.6% Poor
Read 110
Write 111
Mixed 97.2
SusWrite 3.9
104% 80.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
124% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 69%
External USB3.0 DISK04 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.4 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9 47 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Read 163
Write 161
Mixed 130
SusWrite 8.6
147% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
133% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
31.1% Below average
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 8.8
28% 9.77 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 9.8
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97 GAMING 3 (MS-7918) Builds (Compare 1,593 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI H97 GAMING 3 (MS-7918) - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $868
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback