Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive258% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200701
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 01 '21 at 20:53
Run Duration352 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$149
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Memory 75.7
1-Core 143
2-Core 285
90% 168 Pts
4-Core 526
8-Core 881
86% 704 Pts
64-Core 1,363
84% 1,363 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.47
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 131
Reflection 142
Parallax 144
107% 139 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 135
Splatting 118
101% 123 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M81000G 1TB
580GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1581 1573 1677 1693 1699 460 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
258% Outstanding
Read 1725
Write 1,707
Mixed 1,357
SusWrite 1,447
351% 1,559 MB/s
4K Read 53.5
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 73.7
240% 82.7 MB/s
DQ Read 598
DQ Write 552
DQ Mixed 443
368% 531 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 258%
Great: 311%
Sandisk X600 M.2 2280 SATA 128GB
105GB free
Firmware: X6113012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 109 110 109 109 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Read 496
Write 473
Mixed 335
SusWrite 123
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 75.2
4K Mixed 42.1
145% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 303
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 256
195% 264 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 82%
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$51
208GB free
Firmware: UF220400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 144 143 151 148 147 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
56% Above average
Read 453
Write 386
Mixed 192
SusWrite 174
67% 301 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 40.5
4K Mixed 16.2
75% 26.1 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 97.5
DQ Mixed 33.2
45% 83.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 56%
Great: 55%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
103GB free
Firmware: EB01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 118 118 121 119 121 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 118
Write 114
Mixed 67.1
SusWrite 119
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
195% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 71%
External USB3.0 DISK00 8TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 80 83 84 85 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 80.1
Write 105
Mixed 118
SusWrite 82.2
136% 96.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.7
209% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 75%
External USB3.0 DISK01 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 154 155 155 156 153 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 176
Write 170
Mixed 85
SusWrite 155
194% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
101% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 70%
External USB3.0 DISK02 4TB
499GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0.1 0 0 0 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
20% Poor
Read 105
Write 104
Mixed 72
SusWrite 0
88% 70.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 20%
Great: 66%
WD My Passport 0820 2TB
2TB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 108 108 108 108 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 109
Write 110
Mixed 61.6
SusWrite 108
130% 97.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 42%
External USB3.0 DISK03 8TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0 0 0 0.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
25.2% Poor
Read 130
Write 138
Mixed 75.7
SusWrite 0
108% 86 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.4
119% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 75%
External USB3.0 DISK04 4TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 154 154 155 156 152 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 168
Write 161
Mixed 86.1
SusWrite 154
189% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.9% Good
MC Read 29
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 28
71% 25 GB/s
SC Read 20.3
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 26.5
61% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 89
45% 89 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING Builds (Compare 14,290 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING - $160

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $841
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback