Gigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 129%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics8.89% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive531% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory22.7 GB free of 32 GB
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '23 at 13:09
Run Duration315 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700K-$330
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 5.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Memory 91.2
1-Core 221
2-Core 442
131% 252 Pts
4-Core 888
8-Core 1,712
154% 1,300 Pts
64-Core 3,195
198% 3,195 Pts
Poor: 120%
This bench: 129%
Great: 131%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 770
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4032
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
8.89% Terrible
Lighting 10
Reflection 15.4
Parallax 11.2
8% 12.2 fps
MRender 13.5
Gravity 12.4
Splatting 12.2
10% 12.7 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.89%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 PRO with Heatsink 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3248 3372 3423 3381 3391 3252 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
531% Outstanding
Read 2,936
Write 3,492
Mixed 3,106
SusWrite 3,345
729% 3,220 MB/s
4K Read 85.5
4K Write 234
4K Mixed 123
411% 147 MB/s
DQ Read 2,140
DQ Write 1,557
DQ Mixed 1,766
1,342% 1,821 MB/s
Poor: 253%
This bench: 531%
Great: 519%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
476GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 482 484 478 484 488 488 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 480
Mixed 398
SusWrite 484
106% 470 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 55.8
196% 73.3 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 341
256% 343 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 126%
Great: 124%
Seagate ST4000NM0033-9ZM170 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: SN06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 143 136 139 143 142 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 96.2
Write 82.2
Mixed 78.3
SusWrite 140
73% 99.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 105%
WD WD8003VRYZ-02MVAB1 8TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01H02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 127 125 129 128 126 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Read 169
Write 158
Mixed 82.5
SusWrite 127
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 1.1
272% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 120%
JMicron Generic DISK00 8TB
4.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 35 34 34 35 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 92.7
Write 123
Mixed 116
SusWrite 34.9
126% 91.7 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.6
211% 4 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 76%
JMicron Generic DISK01 8TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 35 34 34 35 38 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
36.9% Below average
Read 100
Write 126
Mixed 80
SusWrite 34.9
113% 85.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.6
186% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 91%
JMicron Generic DISK02 8TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 35 34 34 35 38 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 86.5
Write 94.5
Mixed 113
SusWrite 34.9
112% 82.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.7
206% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 80%
JMicron Generic DISK03 8TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 35 34 34 35 38 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 123
Write 134
Mixed 120
SusWrite 34.9
137% 103 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.7
200% 3.83 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 73%
JMicron Generic DISK04 8TB
404GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 35 34 34 35 38 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
41.8% Average
Read 126
Write 149
Mixed 104
SusWrite 34.9
136% 103 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.7
207% 4.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 74%
JMicron Generic DISK05 8TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 35 34 34 35 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
33.6% Below average
Read 78.3
Write 104
Mixed 86.9
SusWrite 34.9
104% 76.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.6
185% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 87%
JMicron Generic DISK06 8TB
814GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 35 34 34 35 38 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
41% Average
Read 121
Write 146
Mixed 116
SusWrite 34.9
140% 105 MB/s
4K Read 8.2
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.7
207% 4.47 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 41%
Great: 55%
JMicron Generic DISK07 8TB
144GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 35 34 34 35 38 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 124
Write 157
Mixed 113
SusWrite 34.9
143% 107 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.7
214% 3.67 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc UD5-7200 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 7200 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
211% Outstanding
MC Read 94.2
MC Write 75.3
MC Mixed 81.3
239% 83.6 GB/s
SC Read 24.8
SC Write 51.9
SC Mixed 35.5
107% 37.4 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 149%
This bench: 211%
Great: 247%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z690 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 3,447 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 232%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 273%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS MASTER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $1,150
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback