Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics16.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive476% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory93.9 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210809
Uptime6.4 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '22 at 04:01
Run Duration417 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$249
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Memory 76.2
1-Core 165
2-Core 342
102% 195 Pts
4-Core 643
8-Core 1,266
113% 954 Pts
64-Core 2,316
143% 2,316 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Lighting 20.1
Reflection 16.7
Parallax 20.1
16% 19 fps
MRender 23.5
Gravity 21.7
Splatting 16.5
16% 20.6 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG GAMMIX S70 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.2.F.P7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2426 4262 4154 4219 4262 4425 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
476% Outstanding
Read 2,872
Write 4,272
Mixed 2,945
SusWrite 3,958
797% 3,512 MB/s
4K Read 75
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 87.9
289% 93.9 MB/s
DQ Read 898
DQ Write 431
DQ Mixed 585
455% 638 MB/s
Poor: 196%
This bench: 476%
Great: 601%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
747GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 453 452 453 453 451 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 440
Mixed 423
SusWrite 452
102% 454 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 71.9
4K Mixed 51.4
168% 55.3 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 199
150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 109%
Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda Desktop 5TB-$124
709GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 147 146 148 147 145 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 74.8
Write 78.4
Mixed 25.9
SusWrite 145
59% 81.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 7.7
4K Mixed 0.5
232% 3 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC29
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 142 140 141 142 142 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Read 204
Write 168
Mixed 77.9
SusWrite 140
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 113%
WD Black 5TB (2015)-$71
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 143 142 143 142 143 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Read 138
Write 132
Mixed 97.3
SusWrite 144
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1
329% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 107%
JMicron Generic DISK00 8TB
5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 9.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
33% Below average
Read 135
Write 148
Mixed 113
SusWrite 1.6
128% 99.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.7
172% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 33%
Great: 76%
JMicron Generic DISK01 8TB
11GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0 16 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
29.6% Poor
Read 105
Write 141
Mixed 98
SusWrite 2.7
114% 86.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.7
183% 3.67 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 91%
JMicron Generic DISK02 1TB
304GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 91 95 95 87 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 86.9
Write 83
Mixed 63.1
SusWrite 92.8
110% 81.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
71% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 70%
JMicron Generic DISK03 8TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 21 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Read 127
Write 137
Mixed 127
SusWrite 3.5
129% 98.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.7
184% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 73%
JMicron Generic DISK04 5TB
749GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 21 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 108
Write 107
Mixed 90.3
SusWrite 3.5
99% 77.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 10.3
4K Mixed 0.8
380% 3.93 MB/s
DQ Read 0.3
DQ Write 10.8
DQ Mixed 0.9
399% 4 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 49%
JMicron Generic DISK05 14TB
4TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0 16 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
77.7% Very good
Read 215
Write 199
Mixed 186
SusWrite 2.7
191% 151 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 13.7
4K Mixed 1.5
577% 10.4 MB/s
DQ Read 3
DQ Write 8
DQ Mixed 1.3
328% 4.1 MB/s
JMicron Generic DISK06 8TB
5.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 91 95 95 87 95 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 150
Write 174
Mixed 154
SusWrite 92.5
194% 143 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.9
181% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 55%
JMicron Generic DISK07 5TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 7.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.4% Below average
Read 67.4
Write 76.4
Mixed 81
SusWrite 1.3
75% 56.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 9.5
4K Mixed 0.7
349% 3.6 MB/s
DQ Read 0.3
DQ Write 10.5
DQ Mixed 0.9
389% 3.9 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot 3600 C18 Series 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
MC Read 44.1
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 31.3
101% 35.5 GB/s
SC Read 24.8
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 31
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 87.9
46% 87.9 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 152%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING Builds (Compare 8,276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING - $460

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $1,369
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback