MSI Z270 SLI PLUS (MS-7A59)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics59.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive213% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7A59
MotherboardMSI Z270 SLI PLUS (MS-7A59)  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170627
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 16 '18 at 13:55
Run Duration305 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Memory 93.8
1-Core 130
2-Core 247
89% 157 Pts
4-Core 437
8-Core 704
70% 570 Pts
64-Core 704
44% 704 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Lighting 74.1
Reflection 70.6
Parallax 61.6
60% 68.7 fps
MRender 72
Gravity 68.9
Splatting 71.9
58% 70.9 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 626 313 305 299 299 299 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
213% Outstanding
Read 1,998
Write 1,419
Mixed 532
SusWrite 357
237% 1,076 MB/s
4K Read 43.9
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 53.8
220% 85.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,059
DQ Write 940
DQ Mixed 649
583% 883 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 213%
Great: 236%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
99GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 302 302 307 310 310 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 486
Mixed 398
SusWrite 320
96% 426 MB/s
4K Read 47.9
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 62.7
216% 76.6 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 353
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 123%
Great: 124%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
447GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 70 64 70 63 64 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 76.8
Write 74.4
Mixed 37.1
SusWrite 67.4
47% 63.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 51%
Seagate BUP Slim BL 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 118 114 118 118 117 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 100
Write 124
Mixed 92.2
SusWrite 116
80% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.7
201% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 66%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
895GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 84 86 86 86 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 85
Write 63.6
Mixed 76.7
SusWrite 84.7
58% 77.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 59%
JMicron Generic DISK04 5TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 98 106 106 106 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 90
Write 98
Mixed 73.8
SusWrite 103
126% 91.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.6
175% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 49%
JMicron Generic DISK03 6TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 99 106 106 106 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 139
Write 150
Mixed 107
SusWrite 104
168% 125 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.7
182% 3 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 77%
JMicron Generic DISK02 4TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
27.5% Poor
Read 90.2
Write 112
Mixed 80
SusWrite 0.2
92% 70.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.6
181% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 68%
JMicron Generic DISK01 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 117 118 117 118 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 114
Write 113
Mixed 83.2
SusWrite 116
144% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
85% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 71%
JMicron Generic DISK00 5TB
4.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 118 119 117 119 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
56% Above average
Read 113
Write 133
Mixed 80.7
SusWrite 117
152% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.9
188% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 56%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLT8G4D26AFTA.16FBD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
MC Read 32.7
MC Write 34.7
MC Mixed 28.3
91% 31.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 36.4
SC Mixed 27.8
80% 28 GB/s
Latency 60.3
66% 60.3 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 SLI PLUS (MS-7A59) Builds (Compare 2,314 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI Z270 SLI PLUS (MS-7A59) - $136

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $791
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback