Gigabyte GA-X79-UD5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics36.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X79-UD5  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20131009
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateJul 03 '16 at 06:39
Run Duration268 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 87
1-Core 65.1
2-Core 183
64% 112 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 472
49% 394 Pts
64-Core 478
30% 478 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
Gigabyte(1458 254D) 3GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 16.200.1025.0
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Lighting 47.4
Reflection 32.3
Parallax 64.4
39% 48 fps
MRender 30.5
Gravity 47.3
Splatting 40.3
32% 39.4 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 4 256GB-$400
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.5 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Read 496
Write 399
Mixed 395
96% 430 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 77.3
4K Mixed 28.1
113% 43.1 MB/s
DQ Read 213
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 89.6
101% 172 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 106%
Patriot Pyro 120GB-$73
26GB free
Firmware: 332ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.9% Below average
Read 205
Write 109
Mixed 118
32% 144 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 47.2
4K Mixed 12.6
69% 26 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 31.2
44% 82.3 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75
157GB free
Firmware: CC24 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 112
Write 133
Mixed 134
96% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.96
4K Write 1.08
4K Mixed 0.21
83% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 113%
JMicron Generic DISK02 5TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 102
Write 152
Mixed 78
146% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.27
4K Write 8.43
4K Mixed 0.69
315% 3.46 MB/s
DQ Read 1.55
DQ Write 10.8
DQ Mixed 0.78
398% 4.36 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 80%
JMicron Generic DISK01 5TB
910GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
65% Good
Read 77.3
Write 114
Mixed 81.8
122% 90.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.24
4K Write 9.36
4K Mixed 0.57
342% 3.72 MB/s
DQ Read 1.31
DQ Write 11
DQ Mixed 0.54
396% 4.27 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 65%
Great: 65%
JMicron Generic DISK00 5TB
72GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Read 113
Write 109
Mixed 77.8
125% 99.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 10.1
4K Mixed 0.4
359% 3.7 MB/s
DQ Read 0.67
DQ Write 10.3
DQ Mixed 0.31
364% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 2133 C11 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.3% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 17.3
52% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 8.9
28% 9.77 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X79-UD5 Builds (Compare 169 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X79-UD5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $397
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback