Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics35.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory14.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200716
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateAug 13 '22 at 23:11
Run Duration660 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2300X Quad-Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
63.3% Good
Memory 64
1-Core 110
2-Core 213
70% 129 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 364
48% 363 Pts
64-Core 395
24% 395 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1250 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.20.19.01
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35.9% Below average
Lighting 47.9
Reflection 36.5
Parallax 24.7
39% 36.4 fps
MRender 48.9
Gravity 23.9
Splatting 37.2
30% 36.7 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$40
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 273 174 73 68 89 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
27.6% Poor
Read 399
Write 22.4
Mixed 55
SusWrite 140
33% 154 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.6
11% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 302%
SABRENT 240GB
64GB free
Firmware: 1214
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 69 53 42 40 50 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
9.25% Terrible
Read 104
Write 27.8
Mixed 13.9
SusWrite 49.9
11% 48.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
8% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 9.25%
Great: 74%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
915GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 116 87 46 43 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 133
Write 6.6
Mixed 17.9
SusWrite 69
41% 56.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.3
68% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 109%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 10TB
5TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 74 49 45 32 48 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 117
Write 62.4
Mixed 26.4
SusWrite 49.6
46% 63.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.7
241% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 102%
Seagate FireCuda HDD 1TB
224GB free
Firmware: 0003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 12 8 11 10 7.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
5.91% Terrible
Read 11.6
Write 7.4
Mixed 13.6
SusWrite 9
8% 10.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
17% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 5.91%
Great: 69%
JMicron Generic DISK00 8TB
5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 1.8 1.6 2.2 2.7 2.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
5.77% Terrible
Read 28.5
Write 9
Mixed 14.1
SusWrite 2.3
15% 13.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
27% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 5.77%
Great: 76%
JMicron Generic DISK01 5TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 8.3 5.8 4.6 4.2 5.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
7.26% Terrible
Read 27.2
Write 8.9
Mixed 14.9
SusWrite 5.8
16% 14.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
34% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.26%
Great: 65%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 32GB
11GB free, PID 0749
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 11 5.8 6.8 8.8 8.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
3.44% Terrible
Read 10.8
Write 4.9
Mixed 7.9
SusWrite 8.4
10% 8 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
4% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 3.44%
Great: 37%
JMicron Generic DISK03 2TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.7 2 6.8 10 9.4 7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
6.65% Terrible
Read 29.5
Write 22.9
Mixed 14.4
SusWrite 6.1
22% 18.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.2
19% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.65%
Great: 55%
JMicron Generic DISK02 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 26 20 19 19 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
9.94% Terrible
Read 28
Write 8.3
Mixed 5.7
SusWrite 20.8
19% 15.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
22% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.94%
Great: 65%
WD My Passport 25E1 1TB
98GB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 13 12 9.2 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
8.44% Terrible
Read 29.2
Write 14.4
Mixed 14.5
SusWrite 11.8
21% 17.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.2
25% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 8.44%
Great: 65%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 124GB
40GB free, PID 559c
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 3 3.8 4.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
2.97% Terrible
Read 13.1
Write 2.7
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 3.4
7% 6.17 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
11% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 2.97%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
68.1% Good
MC Read 24.9
MC Write 24.4
MC Mixed 24.6
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 21.5
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,003 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $348
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback