Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics36.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141001
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 08 '21 at 18:44
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 59%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$50
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
78% Very good
Memory 90.2
1-Core 109
2-Core 219
80% 140 Pts
4-Core 379
8-Core 395
52% 387 Pts
64-Core 397
25% 397 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 78%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Lighting 47.3
Reflection 49
Parallax 42.9
38% 46.4 fps
MRender 38
Gravity 45.6
Splatting 38
33% 40.5 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 120 118 122 122 117 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Read 479
Write 455
Mixed 238
SusWrite 121
72% 323 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 40.2
157% 59.6 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 215
175% 255 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 124%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$81
387GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 103 103 103 103 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 152
Write 146
Mixed 91.7
SusWrite 103
91% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
192% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 87%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 124GB
82GB free, PID 559c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.5 1.8 7.2 4.4 1.8 1.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
6.35% Terrible
Read 36.5
Write 29.2
Mixed 23
SusWrite 3.1
28% 22.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
8% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.35%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.8% Average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 13.8
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 13.5
40% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VII RANGER Builds (Compare 2,802 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER - $283

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $918
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback