Asus Z97-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Z97-E  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160223
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '22 at 21:42
Run Duration640 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 114
2-Core 199
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 612
62% 501 Pts
64-Core 620
38% 620 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.4% Poor
Lighting 37
Reflection 42
Parallax 38.5
30% 39.2 fps
MRender 37.4
Gravity 38.9
Splatting 28.1
28% 34.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB70H1Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 680
Write 567
Mixed 477
128% 575 MB/s
4K Read 50
4K Write 90.3
4K Mixed 59.7
200% 66.7 MB/s
DQ Read 764
DQ Write 605
DQ Mixed 625
484% 665 MB/s
Poor: 101% Great: 317%
Covecube Virtual Disk 2TB
8TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 112 110 110 109 110 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
12.9% Very poor
Read 98.3
Write 98.2
Mixed 64.1
SusWrite 110
21% 92.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 8.6
4K Mixed 1
7% 3.53 MB/s
DQ Read 0.6
DQ Write 6
DQ Mixed 2.4
2% 3 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 115%
Covecube Virtual Disk 2TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 136 133 133 134 135 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 175
Mixed 82.6
SusWrite 134
105% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 105%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 2TB
426GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 77 77 77 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 82.7
Write 80.3
Mixed 76
SusWrite 76.7
59% 78.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
155% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 109%
WD WD120EMAZ-11BLFA0 12TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 159 156 155 157 159 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Read 140
Write 140
Mixed 81.7
SusWrite 157
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 1.3
324% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 114%
External USB3.0 DISK04 8TB
3TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 2.1 1.8 1.5 1.2 8.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 121
Write 144
Mixed 67.3
SusWrite 3.2
106% 83.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 0.6
225% 3.63 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 74%
JMicron Generic DISK00 4TB
324GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 20 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
26.2% Poor
Read 48.9
Write 61
Mixed 64.3
SusWrite 19.3
66% 48.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.5
182% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 73%
JMicron Generic DISK01 4TB
43GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 36 35 35 35 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
28.4% Poor
Read 107
Write 65.7
Mixed 70.1
SusWrite 35.7
87% 69.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 47%
External USB3.0 DISK02 8TB
322GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 67 69 66 67 67 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 74.3
Write 130
Mixed 86.3
SusWrite 66.6
126% 89.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.7
182% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 73%
External USB3.0 DISK00 4TB
227GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 66 68 65 67 67 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 112
Write 143
Mixed 103
SusWrite 65.5
144% 106 MB/s
4K Read 8.3
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.7
228% 4.7 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 77%
JMicron Generic DISK00 5TB
3TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.9 0.4 0.3 0.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.6% Average
Read 108
Write 162
Mixed 82
SusWrite 0.6
116% 88 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 10.3
4K Mixed 0.9
384% 3.97 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 10.7
DQ Mixed 1
399% 4.03 MB/s
JMicron Generic DISK00 5TB
2TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 36 35 35 35 36 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.8% Average
Read 66.1
Write 110
Mixed 80.6
SusWrite 35.7
102% 73.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 10.5
4K Mixed 0.7
383% 3.9 MB/s
DQ Read 0.3
DQ Write 10.9
DQ Mixed 0.7
396% 3.97 MB/s
JMicron Generic DISK01 5TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 55 59 59 59 59 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
41% Average
Read 97.1
Write 103
Mixed 68.2
SusWrite 57.8
108% 81.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.6
180% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 41%
Great: 65%
JMicron Generic DISK02 4TB
2.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 73 68 69 70 69 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 150
Write 160
Mixed 110
SusWrite 69.9
162% 123 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.8
209% 3.83 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 53%
JMicron Generic DISK03 5TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 20 20 20 23 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.9% Below average
Read 107
Write 120
Mixed 72.8
SusWrite 19.9
103% 79.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.6
177% 2 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 69%
JMicron Generic DISK03 2TB
1.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 23 24 23 24 24 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.1% Poor
Read 122
Write 119
Mixed 74.5
SusWrite 23.6
107% 84.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
95% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 30%
JMicron Generic DISK02 5TB
1TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0 0.1 0.1 0 77 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.3% Average
Read 145
Write 124
Mixed 45.7
SusWrite 13
97% 82 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 7.2
4K Mixed 1
283% 3.13 MB/s
JMicron Generic DISK02 5TB
215GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 20 20 20 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
26% Poor
Read 57.4
Write 71.2
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 19.8
74% 54.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.5
166% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26%
Great: 80%
JMicron Generic DISK01 4TB
3.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 24 24 23 24 24 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
34.8% Below average
Read 165
Write 161
Mixed 73
SusWrite 24.1
131% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 47%
WD Elements 25A3 10TB
1TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 122 118 125 123 124 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 141
Write 153
Mixed 97.4
SusWrite 122
173% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 1.4
245% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 95%
External USB3.0 DISK01 8TB
287GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 77 83 79 86 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 114
Write 124
Mixed 106
SusWrite 81.4
144% 106 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.6
184% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 90%
External USB3.0 DISK03 6TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 75 89 89 90 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 85
Write 106
Mixed 93.1
SusWrite 87.2
129% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.6
208% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/8GX KHX1600C9D3/8GX KHX1600C9D3/4GX 99U5403-065.A00LF 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.6% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 11.9
37% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 12
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-E Builds (Compare 703 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $648
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback