Gigabyte GA-Z97-D3H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics13.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive110% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemGigabyte Z97-D3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z97-D3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150421
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateDec 24 '16 at 10:37
Run Duration934 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 66%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
82% Excellent
Memory 90.3
1-Core 121
2-Core 226
83% 146 Pts
4-Core 397
8-Core 618
63% 507 Pts
64-Core 648
40% 648 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 82%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7770
Gigabyte(1458 2556) 1GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 16.11.2
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Lighting 16.8
Reflection 17.5
Parallax 22.6
14% 19 fps
MRender 14.5
Gravity 15.4
Splatting 19.2
14% 16.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
323GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 400
Mixed 410
98% 439 MB/s
4K Read 44.8
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 40.4
176% 63.8 MB/s
DQ Read 305
DQ Write 256
DQ Mixed 95.3
122% 219 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 110%
Great: 134%
JMicron Generic DISK03 2TB
606GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.6% Poor
Read 82.4
Write 71.9
Mixed 8.68
61% 54.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.28
4K Write 0.63
4K Mixed 0.11
26% 0.34 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 30%
JMicron Generic DISK01 500GB
403GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.5% Poor
Read 52.6
Write 47.4
Mixed 8.84
42% 36.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 0.79
4K Mixed 0.21
35% 0.46 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 37%
JMicron Generic DISK03 2TB
263GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
30.2% Below average
Read 63.6
Write 68.6
Mixed 8.33
55% 46.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.91
4K Mixed 0.17
74% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 55%
JMicron Generic DISK00 204GB
190GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.1% Poor
Read 56.3
Write 59.2
Mixed 36.8
64% 50.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.93
4K Mixed 0.47
84% 1.01 MB/s
JMicron Generic DISK02 500GB
157GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
40% Average
Read 91.4
Write 87.9
Mixed 24.1
80% 67.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 2.43
4K Mixed 0.29
95% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 40%
Great: 75%
JMicron Generic DISK00 500GB
117GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 87.8
Write 83.9
Mixed 51
92% 74.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.61
4K Mixed 0.51
75% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 51%
JMicron Generic DISK02 240GB
100GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
133% Outstanding
Read 150
Write 166
Mixed 137
196% 151 MB/s
4K Read 13.2
4K Write 23.3
4K Mixed 8.79
1,140% 15.1 MB/s
DQ Read 18.2
DQ Write 35.7
DQ Mixed 8.44
1,570% 20.8 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
50.8% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 15.4
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 16.3
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z97-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 1,561 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z97-D3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $648
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback