Asus H170M-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics52.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive295% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H170M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory58.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 14 '22 at 00:38
Run Duration421 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 114
2-Core 206
74% 160 Pts
4-Core 413
8-Core 617
64% 515 Pts
64-Core 577
36% 577 Pts
Poor: 60% Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Gigabyte(1458 3670) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Lighting 66.2
Reflection 70
Parallax 62.9
54% 66.4 fps
MRender 66.9
Gravity 62.6
Splatting 54.6
50% 61.4 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 PRO with Heatsink 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1640 1599 1739 1703 1521 1690 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
295% Outstanding
Read 1,664
Write 1,814
Mixed 1,470
SusWrite 1,648
372% 1,649 MB/s
4K Read 69.3
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 79.1
266% 87 MB/s
DQ Read 1,099
DQ Write 960
DQ Mixed 1,052
783% 1,037 MB/s
Poor: 253%
This bench: 295%
Great: 519%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
93GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 394 412 400 394 412 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 474
Write 427
Mixed 352
SusWrite 401
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 89.4
4K Mixed 47.4
159% 56.8 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 328
247% 330 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 108%
Great: 124%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113
159GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 57 57 56 50 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
35% Below average
Read 66.2
Write 74.5
Mixed 52.3
SusWrite 55.2
46% 62 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35%
Great: 60%
G-drive USB 6TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 2602
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 198
Write 180
Mixed 80.1
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 128%
WD WD8003VRYZ-02MVAB1 8TB
936GB free
Firmware: 01.01H02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 143 146 144 144 146 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 188
Mixed 86
SusWrite 145
111% 152 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 1.4
306% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 120%
Seagate ST4000NM0033-9ZM170 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: SN06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 151 152 151 152 152 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 106
Write 97.5
Mixed 79
SusWrite 152
80% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
173% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 105%
JMicron Generic DISK00 8TB
972GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 31 32 32 36 34 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 86.2
Write 113
Mixed 114
SusWrite 32.8
119% 86.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.6
202% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 76%
JMicron Generic DISK01 8TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 31 32 32 35 34 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
39% Below average
Read 126
Write 154
Mixed 116
SusWrite 32.9
142% 107 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.7
181% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 39%
Great: 91%
JMicron Generic DISK02 8TB
202GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 31 32 32 35 34 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
35% Below average
Read 99.2
Write 126
Mixed 104
SusWrite 32.9
122% 90.3 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.6
176% 3.6 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 35%
Great: 80%
JMicron Generic DISK03 8TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 31 32 32 36 34 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Read 96.8
Write 115
Mixed 109
SusWrite 32.8
119% 88.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.6
176% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 73%
JMicron Generic DISK04 8TB
283GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 31 32 32 35 34 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 138
Write 153
Mixed 114
SusWrite 32.9
143% 109 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.7
175% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 74%
JMicron Generic DISK05 8TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 31 32 32 36 34 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 141
Write 178
Mixed 131
SusWrite 32.8
161% 121 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.8
209% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 87%
JMicron Generic DISK06 8TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 31 32 32 36 34 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 103
Write 125
Mixed 100
SusWrite 32.8
121% 90.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.6
176% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 55%
JMicron Generic DISK07 8TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 31 32 32 36 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 99.6
Write 128
Mixed 111
SusWrite 32.8
126% 92.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.6
204% 3.63 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 80%
Typical H170M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,327 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H170M-PLUS - $296

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $691
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback