Asus H170M-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 49% Yacht	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 42% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	55% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	89.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus H170M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit 色彩
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170710
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Nov 09 '17 at 07:54
Run Duration	387 Seconds
Run User	HKG-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$170 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	81.1% Excellent	Memory 83 1-Core 116 2-Core 229 80% 143 Pts	4-Core 427 8-Core 646 67% 536 Pts	64-Core 655 41% 655 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 81.1% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Gigabyte(1458 3670) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	55% Above average	Lighting 70.1 Reflection 69.1 Parallax 65.8 57% 68.3 fps	MRender 71.4 Gravity 63.3 Splatting 55.3 51% 63.3 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 500GB 25,072 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 174GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT21B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 10369 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 232 (B1) Unknown 98 98 39 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 48 38 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 68 (F1) Unknown 99 99 44879384132	89.8% Excellent	Read 504 Write 383 Mixed 408 96% 432 MB/s	4K Read 41.8 4K Write 80.9 4K Mixed 25.5 139% 49.4 MB/s	DQ Read 43 DQ Write 201 DQ Mixed 24.7 48% 89.7 MB/s
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 89.8% Great: 131%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 61GB free Firmware: EXM01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 18447 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 585 (B1) Unknown 99 99 13 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 58 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 55 (F1) Unknown 99 99 14823426315	99.1% Outstanding	Read 515 Write 460 Mixed 497 110% 491 MB/s	4K Read 34.9 4K Write 93.2 4K Mixed 25.7 135% 51.2 MB/s	DQ Read 221 DQ Write 256 DQ Mixed 113 120% 196 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 99.1% Great: 124%
WD WD8003VRYZ-02MVAB1 8TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 6.5TB free Firmware: 01.01H02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 132 132 102 (03) Spinup time 141 141 34389819868 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 44 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 128 128 18 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 41 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 11 (16) Unknown 100 100 100 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 125 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 125 (C2) HDA temperature 176 176 158915428386 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	120% Outstanding	Read 205 Write 212 Mixed 194 153% 203 MB/s	4K Read 0.73 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 0.82 203% 1.98 MB/s
Poor: 85% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 120%
Seagate ST4000NM0033-9ZM170 4TB 3,748 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1.5TB free Firmware: SN06 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 82 63 169180161 (03) Spinup time 92 91 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1824 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 85 60 384123097 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 10296 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 225 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 51 689700899 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 96 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 94 94 13649 (C2) HDA temperature 35 49 73014444067 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 37 5 169180161 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	83.5% Excellent	Read 156 Write 135 Mixed 154 112% 148 MB/s	4K Read 0.84 4K Write 2.07 4K Mixed 0.41 118% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 83.5% Great: 105%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113 12,948 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1.5TB free Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 148 145 9600 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3642 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 60 60 29409 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 477 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 49 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3592 (C2) HDA temperature 116 97 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	46.9% Average	Read 79 Write 84.1 Mixed 78.7 61% 80.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.67 4K Mixed 0.2 75% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 60%
G-drive USB 6TB 199 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 207GB free Firmware: 2602 Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	80.9% Excellent	Read 156 Write 127 Mixed 155 110% 146 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.32 4K Mixed 0.51 103% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 128%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905622-058.A00G 2x8GB 2,759 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	69.1% Good	MC Read 27.4 MC Write 26.6 MC Mixed 20 70% 24.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.5 SC Write 23.9 SC Mixed 21.4 57% 19.9 GB/s	Latency 75.2 53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 69.1% Great: 74%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H170M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,327 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H170M-PLUS - $296

CPU
Core i7-6700Intel $170Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	327x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	286x
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	143x

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	141x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	107x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	75x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	52x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	30x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	27x

RAM
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GBHyperX $125Bench 73%, 59,072 samples	59x
HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GBKingstonBench 68%, 49,673 samples	43x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 69%, 47,721 samples	32x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $691

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154	Nvidia RTX 4060 $250	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406