Asus PRIME B450M-A II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics16.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive189% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME B450M-A II  (all builds)
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220428
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '23 at 15:46
Run Duration380 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$119
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Memory 74.7
1-Core 157
2-Core 320
97% 184 Pts
4-Core 582
8-Core 811
88% 697 Pts
64-Core 1,026
64% 1,026 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 8809) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 30.0.13014.8
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Lighting 21.2
Reflection 20.5
Parallax 28.6
17% 23.4 fps
MRender 13.5
Gravity 22.5
Splatting 21.4
16% 19.1 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$55
338GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P2CR048 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1792 1135 487 651 549 458 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
189% Outstanding
Read 1,106
Write 1845
Mixed 1,326
SusWrite 846
290% 1,281 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 45.1
176% 63.7 MB/s
DQ Read 993
DQ Write 791
DQ Mixed 928
685% 904 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 189%
Great: 253%
Sabrent Disk Dev 4TB
177GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 19 20 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
21.2% Poor
Read 53.8
Write 34.5
Mixed 30.7
SusWrite 19.5
26% 34.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 110%
Sabrent Disk Dev 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 19 20 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
21.9% Poor
Read 56
Write 34.5
Mixed 35.3
SusWrite 19.6
27% 36.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
164% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 110%
OOS12000G 12TB
2TB free
Firmware: OOS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 143 138 115 116 106 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 27% Great: 127%
OOS10000G 10TB
1TB free
Firmware: OOS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 154 153 143 149 148 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 56% Great: 97%
JMicron Generic DISK03 4TB
2.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 37 37 38 38 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Read 178
Write 166
Mixed 97.2
SusWrite 38.1
150% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 40%
JMicron Generic DISK04 12TB
7TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0 0 0.1 0 62 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
86.3% Excellent
Read 226
Write 211
Mixed 209
SusWrite 10.4
211% 164 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 15.3
4K Mixed 1.1
625% 11.5 MB/s
DQ Read 4.3
DQ Write 7.6
DQ Mixed 0.2
281% 4.03 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 86%
JMicron Generic DISK03 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 40 41 41 40 41 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 170
Write 38.7
Mixed 47.2
SusWrite 40.7
79% 74.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.8
52% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 62%
JMicron Generic DISK02 12TB
6TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 33 33 28 33 33 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 224
Write 222
Mixed 210
SusWrite 31.1
224% 172 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 7.7
4K Mixed 1.1
371% 9.37 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 78%
JMicron Generic DISK04 3TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 41 42 41 41 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
34.5% Below average
Read 123
Write 125
Mixed 97.1
SusWrite 41.1
126% 96.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
119% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 63%
JMicron Generic DISK01 3TB
799GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 37 37 37 38 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.2% Below average
Read 164
Write 30.1
Mixed 39.1
SusWrite 37.5
70% 67.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.5
32% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 47%
JMicron Generic DISK00 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 66 66 62 65 66 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
39.4% Below average
Read 126
Write 129
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 65
108% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
102% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 73%
JMicron Generic DISK01 3TB
86GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 33 33 31 33 33 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
31.8% Below average
Read 154
Write 40.9
Mixed 49.1
SusWrite 32.5
75% 69.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.8
55% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 57%
JMicron Generic DISK00 4TB
2.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 40 40 45 44 44 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 168
Write 161
Mixed 90.5
SusWrite 41.7
146% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
97% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 56%
JMicron Generic DISK02 3TB
32GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 39 33 37 38 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33% Below average
Read 162
Write 32.9
Mixed 45.5
SusWrite 37.3
73% 69.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
30% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 33%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2666 C19 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
MC Read 34.2
MC Write 31.9
MC Mixed 29.9
91% 32 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 36.9
SC Mixed 27.9
84% 29.5 GB/s
Latency 91.1
44% 91.1 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME B450M-A II Builds (Compare 4,773 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B450M-A II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $420
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback