Asus PRIME H270M-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 67% Battle cruiser	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 63% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	92.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	70.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME H270M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170418
Uptime	1.7 Days
Run Date	Jun 14 '20 at 17:08
Run Duration	293 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	24%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$229 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	73.2% Very good	Memory 71.3 1-Core 124 2-Core 218 76% 138 Pts	4-Core 403 8-Core 774 70% 588 Pts	64-Core 765 47% 765 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 73.2% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$241 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Zotac(19DA 4520) CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.75 Performing below potential (77^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	92.5% Outstanding	Lighting 117 Reflection 117 Parallax 110 95% 115 fps	MRender 139 Gravity 104 Splatting 87.9 88% 110 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 92.5% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX900 256GB-$164 6,726 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5.8.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 214 224 210 217 195 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	70.7% Very good	Read 312 Write 233 Mixed 276 SusWrite 214 58% 259 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 68.3 4K Mixed 30 110% 40.6 MB/s	DQ Read 266 DQ Write 238 DQ Mixed 252 189% 252 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 90%
DAS TerraMaster 8TB 69 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 14GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 113 121 117 117 122 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	61.2% Good	Read 97 Write 118 Mixed 73.8 SusWrite 115 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 0.6 221% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 102%
DAS TerraMaster 8TB 69 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 98 98 89 99 101 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	54.8% Above average	Read 92.8 Write 112 Mixed 91.6 SusWrite 96.4 73% 98.2 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 0.6 250% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 102%
DAS TerraMaster 8TB 69 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 40GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 25 29 44 24 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	22.8% Poor	Read 50.4 Write 58 Mixed 70.4 SusWrite 27.1 39% 51.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 0.5 216% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 22.8% Great: 102%
DAS TerraMaster 12TB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 25GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 100 104 104 100 114 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 22% Great: 128%
DAS TerraMaster 8TB 69 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 284GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 79 72 66 75 74 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	38.9% Below average	Read 59.3 Write 72.3 Mixed 83 SusWrite 74.2 54% 72.2 MB/s	4K Read 3 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 0.6 284% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 102%
JMicron Generic DISK00 4TB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 2.5TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 13 6.5 8.4 10 4.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	12.2% Very poor	Read 52.4 Write 70.2 Mixed 39.7 SusWrite 12.1 58% 43.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.6 42% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 56%
JMicron Generic DISK01 10TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 232GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 13 6.4 8.8 9.9 4.4 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	31.2% Below average	Read 118 Write 112 Mixed 95.5 SusWrite 12.2 108% 84.4 MB/s	4K Read 7.8 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 1 168% 3.97 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 54%
JMicron Generic DISK02 10TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 197GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 171 173 171 171 175 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	83.5% Excellent	Read 223 Write 208 Mixed 113 SusWrite 169 234% 178 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 1.2 203% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 83.5% Great: 83%
JMicron Generic DISK03 10TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 37GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 162 171 169 168 176 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	54.1% Above average	Read 102 Write 126 Mixed 61.1 SusWrite 163 158% 113 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 72% 1 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 55%
JMicron Generic DISK01 4TB 88 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 535GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 125 134 124 141 129 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	61.9% Good	Read 173 Write 178 Mixed 128 SusWrite 129 204% 152 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1 133% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 74%
JMicron Generic DISK02 4TB 67 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 82 51 58 27 77 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	34.3% Below average	Read 115 Write 112 Mixed 82.1 SusWrite 55 119% 90.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 68%
JMicron Generic DISK03 8TB 47 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 2.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 3.8 4.5 7.2 4.8 16 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	36.8% Below average	Read 140 Write 137 Mixed 142 SusWrite 8.6 139% 107 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 0.8 194% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 73%
JMicron Generic DISK04 8TB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 453GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 48 86 68 110 53 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	47.8% Average	Read 114 Write 144 Mixed 142 SusWrite 77.1 165% 119 MB/s	4K Read 5.2 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 0.8 193% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 47.8% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB-$42 105,447 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	40.9% Average	MC Read 16 MC Write 15.5 MC Mixed 13 42% 14.8 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 10.4 SC Mixed 10.3 27% 9.3 GB/s	Latency 98.4 41% 98.4 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME H270M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,153 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H270M-PLUS - $110

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $155Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	301x
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	215x
Core i7-7700KIntel $229Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	133x

GPU
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	132x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	123x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	90x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	48x
SSDNow UV400 240GBKingston $89Bench 71%, 105,079 samples	36x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	29x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	49x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 73%, 66,222 samples	33x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 76%, 105,447 samples	25x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Above average

Total price: $365

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397