Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 117% UFO	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 149% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	60.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	59.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191119
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 11 '20 at 19:35
Run Duration	210 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$486 50,170 User benchmarks, average bench 89% AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	92.7% Outstanding	Memory 70.1 1-Core 159 2-Core 312 95% 180 Pts	4-Core 615 8-Core 1,204 108% 910 Pts	64-Core 2,880 178% 2,880 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 92.7% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 2182) CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.67 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	127% Outstanding	Lighting 174 Reflection 165 Parallax 160 142% 167 fps	MRender 187 Gravity 149 Splatting 107 116% 148 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 127% Great: 134%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$100 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 696GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 79 79 79 78 78 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	60.5% Good	Read 444 Write 87.2 Mixed 128 SusWrite 78.4 40% 184 MB/s	4K Read 19.6 4K Write 82.6 4K Mixed 25.1 106% 42.4 MB/s	DQ Read 184 DQ Write 84.7 DQ Mixed 102 84% 123 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 121%
WD Elements 25A3 8TB 5,644 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1TB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 103 103 104 104 104 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	54.9% Above average	Read 116 Write 124 Mixed 71 SusWrite 104 139% 104 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 1.2 215% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 96%
JMicron Generic DISK00 12TB 2TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 17 20 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	45.2% Average	Read 157 Write 143 Mixed 146 SusWrite 16.9 149% 116 MB/s	4K Read 18.3 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 1.3 272% 8.1 MB/s

JMicron Generic DISK01 10TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 5TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 17 17 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	53.7% Above average	Read 203 Write 196 Mixed 156 SusWrite 16.5 182% 143 MB/s	4K Read 18.5 4K Write 5.3 4K Mixed 1.4 296% 8.4 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 54%
JMicron Generic DISK02 10TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 2.5TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 17 18 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	42.6% Average	Read 172 Write 172 Mixed 99.5 SusWrite 16.7 144% 115 MB/s	4K Read 9.8 4K Write 3.8 4K Mixed 1 200% 4.87 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 83%
JMicron Generic DISK03 10TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2.5TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 49 49 49 50 50 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	54.7% Above average	Read 196 Write 188 Mixed 106 SusWrite 49.2 170% 135 MB/s	4K Read 10 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 1.1 221% 5.13 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 55%
JMicron Generic DISK00 1TB 88 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 680GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 51 50 50 50 50 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	42.6% Average	Read 185 Write 145 Mixed 90 SusWrite 50.3 145% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 81% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 66%
JMicron Generic DISK01 14TB 8TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 51 50 50 50 50 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	70.9% Very good	Read 224 Write 234 Mixed 162 SusWrite 50.2 216% 168 MB/s	4K Read 9.5 4K Write 8.2 4K Mixed 2.2 389% 6.63 MB/s	DQ Read 1.5 DQ Write 6.8 DQ Mixed 2.3 315% 3.53 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GB 12,538 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	75.5% Very good	MC Read 28.9 MC Write 26.6 MC Mixed 26.6 78% 27.4 GB/s	SC Read 21.8 SC Write 18.3 SC Mixed 28.3 65% 22.8 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 139%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,677 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $99

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $165Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,768x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $160Bench 98%, 65,928 samples	4,395x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $113Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,519x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $450Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,310x
RTX 3080Nvidia $730Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,129x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $275Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,514x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,895x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 385%, 327,441 samples	1,134x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $105Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	890x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	794x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $57Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	755x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $100Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	663x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $849

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $299	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350