Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics117% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive308% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory17.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210122
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '21 at 19:13
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$162
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Memory 60.4
1-Core 144
2-Core 284
85% 163 Pts
4-Core 499
8-Core 892
84% 695 Pts
64-Core 1,274
79% 1,274 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
117% Outstanding
Lighting 152
Reflection 160
Parallax 164
124% 159 fps
MRender 178
Gravity 144
Splatting 121
118% 147 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 117%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95
459GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1448 1388 1397 1413 1385 1391 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
308% Outstanding
Read 2,464
Write 1,685
Mixed 1,657
SusWrite 1,404
403% 1,802 MB/s
4K Read 60.7
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 72.4
248% 84.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,170
DQ Write 951
DQ Mixed 1,081
804% 1,067 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 308%
Great: 410%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95
42GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,545
Write 2,280
Mixed 1,785
490% 2,203 MB/s
4K Read 64.9
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 81.1
282% 99.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,245
DQ Write 981
DQ Mixed 1,100
827% 1,109 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
JMicron Generic DISK02 12TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.5 4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
22.1% Poor
Read 38.1
Write 38.8
Mixed 33.2
SusWrite 1.8
36% 28 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.3
224% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 78%
JMicron Generic DISK00 4TB
3TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 34 34 34 34 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
28% Poor
Read 38.6
Write 38.7
Mixed 33
SusWrite 34.2
49% 36.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1.6
221% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 28%
Great: 73%
JMicron Generic DISK01 4TB
541GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.4 1.5 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Read 37.8
Write 38.5
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 1.4
36% 27.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1.2
153% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 74%
JMicron Generic DISK03 4TB
487GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
7.67% Terrible
Read 36.6
Write 35.4
Mixed 27.8
SusWrite 1.5
32% 25.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
44% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 7.67%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$100
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
45.6% Average
MC Read 19
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 19
48% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 16.1
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 11,046 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $1,326
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback