Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME B450M-A II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics26.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive211% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
24 months ago, 23 months ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME B450M-A II  (all builds)
Memory23.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220428
Uptime5.8 Days
Run DateOct 15 '22 at 23:18
Run Duration384 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$139
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Memory 79.4
1-Core 136
2-Core 226
83% 147 Pts
4-Core 434
8-Core 824
75% 629 Pts
64-Core 1,047
65% 1,047 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
EVGA(3842 3765) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
26.6% Poor
Lighting 30.5
Reflection 31.8
Parallax 39.9
25% 34.1 fps
MRender 40.7
Gravity 39.2
Splatting 32.2
30% 37.4 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
254GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P2CR048 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1882 1859 401 86 66 69 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
211% Outstanding
Read 1,199
Write 1,854
Mixed 1383
SusWrite 727
292% 1,291 MB/s
4K Read 47.2
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 70.5
246% 92 MB/s
DQ Read 1,042
DQ Write 863
DQ Mixed 995
734% 967 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 211%
Great: 253%
Sabrent Disk Dev 1TB
589GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 74 68 69 64 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Read 38.6
Write 86.3
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 69.1
40% 55.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.2
39% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 103%
Seagate BUP Slim SL 2TB
20GB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
23.1% Poor
Read 59.2
Write 27.4
Mixed 30.3
SusWrite 21.1
26% 34.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
86% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 65%
Sabrent Disk Dev 4TB
151GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 83 77 79 73 78 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 104
Write 96.8
Mixed 37.8
SusWrite 78.9
58% 79.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
141% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 110%
OOS10000G 10TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: OOS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 179 180 184 184 182 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 56% Great: 97%
JMicron Generic DISK03 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 63 62 62 63 64 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 150
Write 150
Mixed 108
SusWrite 63
154% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
123% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 62%
WD easystore 25FC 2TB
156GB free, PID 25fc
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Read 54.7
Write 31.6
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 21.1
40% 33.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
64% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 62%
JMicron Generic DISK01 3TB
2.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 40 41 41 40 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16.9% Very poor
Read 53
Write 28.6
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 40.3
46% 36.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.3
16% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 47%
JMicron Generic DISK04 2TB
210GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 62 61 61 62 62 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
31.5% Below average
Read 93.3
Write 99.9
Mixed 58.4
SusWrite 61.9
104% 78.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
78% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 38%
JMicron Generic DISK00 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
21.1% Poor
Read 101
Write 109
Mixed 19.2
SusWrite 0.5
69% 57.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
95% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 73%
JMicron Generic DISK01 3TB
356GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 150
Write 37.8
Mixed 49.8
80% 79.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.8
55% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 57%
JMicron Generic DISK04 3TB
132GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 72
Write 30.7
Mixed 33.9
50% 45.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.4
21% 0.5 MB/s
JMicron Generic DISK03 4TB
1.5TB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 58.4
Write 82.3
Mixed 41.7
79% 60.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
56% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 40%
JMicron Generic DISK00 4TB
3.5TB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 77.2
Write 83.2
Mixed 48.7
88% 69.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 56%
JMicron Generic DISK02 3TB
128GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 74
Write 29.7
Mixed 35.4
51% 46.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
20% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 33%
JMicron Generic DISK02 2TB
41GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 37 35 37 39 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
25.7% Poor
Read 91
Write 96.4
Mixed 58.2
SusWrite 36.6
92% 70.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
78% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$53
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 40
MC Write 38.7
MC Mixed 32.6
106% 37.1 GB/s
SC Read 27.1
SC Write 40.3
SC Mixed 29.5
92% 32.3 GB/s
Latency 81.6
49% 81.6 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 103%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME B450M-A II Builds (Compare 4,958 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B450M-A II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $408
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback