HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive60.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory26.9 GB free of 32.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100913
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 26 '17 at 06:56
Run Duration254 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5650
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
60.5% Good
Memory 67.1
1-Core 72.4
2-Core 145
55% 94.8 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 579
51% 434 Pts
64-Core 1,102
68% 1,102 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 71%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 608A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 244
Write 232
Mixed 228
52% 235 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 59.2
4K Mixed 20.8
96% 35 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 55.4
77% 141 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
564GB free
Firmware: CC29 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Read 141
Write 133
Mixed 126
100% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.82
4K Write 1.56
4K Mixed 0.31
98% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 114%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
331GB free
Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 73.1
Write 66.6
Mixed 62.9
51% 67.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.36
4K Mixed 0.18
63% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
26GB free
Firmware: CC4C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 106
Write 99.2
Mixed 97.8
76% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.03
4K Write 1.02
4K Mixed 0.37
103% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 112%
Seagate Cheetah 15K.7 SAS 300GB-$75
23GB free
Firmware: HPS1
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
78% Very good
Read 138
Write 133
Mixed 151
107% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1.02
4K Write 1.01
4K Mixed 0.46
113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 78%
Great: 111%
Generic USB CF Reader 4GB
3GB free, PID 0330, ORICO Docking Station sata 3.0
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 20.7
Write 11.2
Mixed 11.9
17% 14.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.97
4K Write 2.05
4K Mixed 1.02
123% 2.68 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT31GR7CFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7CFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4A-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7CFR4C-H9 66GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 34816 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.9% Below average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 13.8
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 8.4
23% 7.93 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,964 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback