HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive63.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory28.8 GB free of 32.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100913
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 09 '17 at 13:46
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5650
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 91.8
1-Core 72.4
2-Core 145
63% 103 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 477
47% 383 Pts
64-Core 1,099
68% 1,099 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 71%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 608A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 264
Write 224
Mixed 227
53% 239 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 62.8
4K Mixed 23.6
105% 38 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 66.3
79% 136 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
542GB free
Firmware: CC29
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Read 133
Write 132
Mixed 117
96% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.47
4K Mixed 0.32
90% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 114%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
243GB free
Firmware: 0A80
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 73.8
Write 65.6
Mixed 56.2
49% 65.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 1.27
4K Mixed 0.15
64% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
37GB free
Firmware: CC4C
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 117
Write 113
Mixed 123
89% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.79
4K Write 1.05
4K Mixed 0.4
97% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 112%
Seagate Cheetah 15K.7 SAS 300GB-$75
23GB free
Firmware: HPS1
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Read 158
Write 148
Mixed 146
114% 151 MB/s
4K Read 1.09
4K Write 0.66
4K Mixed 0.46
109% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT31GR7CFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7CFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4A-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7CFR4C-H9 66GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 34816 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.6% Below average
MC Read 15
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 13
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 8.1
22% 7.7 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,966 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $151
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback