HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive42% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory29.9 GB free of 32.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100913
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 09 '17 at 15:08
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5650
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 92
1-Core 72.4
2-Core 145
64% 103 Pts
4-Core 289
8-Core 578
51% 434 Pts
64-Core 1109
69% 1109 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 71%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BBF0
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
42% Average
Read 136
Write 126
Mixed 128
29% 130 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 39.8
4K Mixed 20.3
82% 27.7 MB/s
DQ Read 89.4
DQ Write 88.7
DQ Mixed 43.6
45% 73.9 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 42%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
542GB free
Firmware: CC29 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Read 147
Write 140
Mixed 134
106% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 1.56
4K Mixed 0.29
87% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 114%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
243GB free
Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 72.2
Write 65.4
Mixed 59.7
49% 65.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.35
4K Mixed 0.17
65% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
37GB free
Firmware: CC4C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 121
Write 115
Mixed 100
84% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.11
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.39
110% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT31GR7CFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7CFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4A-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7CFR4C-H9 66GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 34816 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
42.1% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 13.8
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 8
22% 7.83 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,966 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $151
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback