Today's hottest deals

HP EliteDesk 705 G1 DM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteDesk 705 G1 DM  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 225E
Memory1.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180831
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJan 16 '22 at 15:02
Run Duration404 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 66%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8 PRO-7600B R7, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
24.2% Poor
Memory 33
1-Core 27.9
2-Core 64.1
25% 41.7 Pts
4-Core 87.6
8-Core 98.7
12% 93.1 Pts
64-Core 109
7% 109 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
HP(103C 225E) 960MB
Ram: 960MB, Driver: 21.5.2
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.89% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 4.4
Parallax 5.2
2% 4.03 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 3.7
Splatting 0.2
2% 2.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.89%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
205GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GS2OA3C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 69 76 69 56 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
37% Below average
Read 58.6
Write 68.6
Mixed 25.1
SusWrite 70.1
40% 55.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 37%
Great: 72%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 64GB
8GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 16 17 18 17 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Read 28
Write 14.5
Mixed 21.1
SusWrite 17.1
26% 20.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.9
101% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5673FH0-CH9 M471B5173EB0-YK0 6GB
1333, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 8.4
22% 7.57 GB/s
SC Read 0.4
SC Write 1.7
SC Mixed 3.6
5% 1.9 GB/s
Latency 237
17% 237 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 705 G1 DM Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 705 G1 DM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback