Today's hottest deals

Asrock FM2A68M-DG3+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.19% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A68M-DG3+  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 02 '22 at 12:25
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
44.7% Average
Memory 60.3
1-Core 63.9
2-Core 105
46% 76.3 Pts
4-Core 169
8-Core 179
23% 174 Pts
64-Core 180
11% 180 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
ASRock(1849 1313) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
6.19% Terrible
Lighting 7.4
Reflection 9
Parallax 10
6% 8.8 fps
MRender 7.9
Gravity 7.5
Splatting 8.3
6% 7.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.19%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS542580K9SA00 80GB-$55
0GB free
Firmware: BBBOC3BP
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 44 44 44 44 44 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
25.1% Poor
Read 43.4
Write 39.4
Mixed 23.7
SusWrite 43.8
28% 37.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
113% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 25%
WD WD1600AVVS-63L2B0 160GB
0GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 58 54 56 56 56 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 63.5
Write 59.8
Mixed 43.3
SusWrite 55.6
41% 55.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Samsung M378B5173EB0-CK0 8GB
2132, 2132 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.6% Below average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 16.3
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 10.6
25% 8.8 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A68M-DG3+ Builds (Compare 555 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A68M-DG3+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback