Today's hottest deals

Asus H81M-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics58.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H81M-A  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150526
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 01 '20 at 22:49
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$65
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 91.6
1-Core 104
2-Core 203
77% 133 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 384
49% 373 Pts
64-Core 371
23% 371 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Device(7377 1121) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing below potential (84th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (72 fps cap detected)
58.4% Above average
Lighting 71.3
Reflection 67.4
Parallax 59.4
58% 66 fps
MRender 70.6
Gravity 72.1
Splatting 72.8
59% 71.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
EM200AA001 240GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3.4
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 391
Write 357
Mixed 264
75% 337 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 80
4K Mixed 8.1
85% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 217
DQ Mixed 15.1
53% 113 MB/s
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$15
67GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 64 64 65 64 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Read 59.5
Write 53.2
Mixed 38.6
SusWrite 64
40% 53.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 60%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$89
3TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 174 175 177 172 177 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 121
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 173
93% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
68% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 108%
EM200AA001 200GB
93GB free
Firmware: EMP1CCD4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 78 77 77 74 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 77
Write 77.5
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 76.3
52% 70.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Samsung M378B5173EB0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
57.7% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 17.7
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 17.7
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-A Builds (Compare 1,365 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-A - $47

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $281
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback