Today's hottest deals

MSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics97% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory23.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200929
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 10 '22 at 11:46
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$154
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Memory 85.6
1-Core 143
2-Core 283
93% 171 Pts
4-Core 542
8-Core 1005
92% 774 Pts
64-Core 1,507
93% 1,507 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
Nvidia(10DE 1535) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4850 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 516.59
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (119 fps cap detected)
97% Outstanding
Lighting 119
Reflection 119
Parallax 118
97% 119 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 118
Splatting 119
97% 119 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 97%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2512
Write 2,378
Mixed 1,651
485% 2,180 MB/s
4K Read 65.5
4K Write 159
4K Mixed 88.2
296% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,352
DQ Write 1,074
DQ Mixed 1,192
898% 1206 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$91
529GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1882 1890 1558 1445 1444 1446 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
348% Outstanding
Read 2,511
Write 1,884
Mixed 1763
SusWrite 1,611
435% 1,942 MB/s
4K Read 65.6
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 90.2
298% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,399
DQ Write 1,126
DQ Mixed 1,242
935% 1,256 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 348%
Great: 410%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$30
702GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 95 95 93 96 99 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 56.6
Write 91.7
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 94.9
56% 76.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
91% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 113%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$89
3.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 120 123 148 142 117 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 83.7
Write 85.8
Mixed 60.7
SusWrite 132
66% 90.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
45% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GB-$58
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
98% Outstanding
MC Read 40
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 39.9
102% 35.6 GB/s
SC Read 28
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 31
82% 28.6 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 98%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 11,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37) - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $992
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback