Today's hottest deals

Acer Veriton M265

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAcer Veriton M265  (all builds)
MotherboardACER EG31M
Memory0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090616
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 24 '21 at 13:03
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User KEN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5300-$59
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
38.3% Below average
Memory 64.7
1-Core 27
2-Core 72.3
36% 54.7 Pts
4-Core 72.2
8-Core 73.1
10% 72.6 Pts
64-Core 73.1
4% 73.1 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 43%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD1600AVVS-63L2B0 160GB
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 42 46 43 46 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Read 8
Write 12.4
Mixed 11.7
SusWrite 43.4
14% 18.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
17% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 44%
Generic Flash Disk 4GB
4GB free, PID 2096
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.3 3.3 4.6 3.9 3.9 4.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
2.77% Terrible
Read 7.2
Write 1
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 3.9
4% 3.45 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.77%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
MC Read 5.1
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 4
12% 4.33 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 4.3
11% 3.97 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Veriton M265 Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton M265

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $75
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback