Today's hottest deals

HP ProLiant ML110 G4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 10.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics14.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP ProLiant ML110 G4  (all builds)
MotherboardHP ML110 G4
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20060925
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '19 at 10:51
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 91%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon 3040
PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Memory 14.9
1-Core 21.1
2-Core 29
13% 21.7 Pts
4-Core 31.5
8-Core 37.3
4% 34.4 Pts
64-Core 40.2
2% 40.2 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
Zotac(19DA 4263) 2GB
CLim: 941 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Lighting 17.5
Reflection 15.7
Parallax 23.9
14% 19 fps
MRender 21.6
Gravity 20.9
Splatting 15.3
15% 19.3 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3160812AS 160GB-$63
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AJJ
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 35 30 30 34 30 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
28.6% Poor
Read 66.2
Write 60.7
Mixed 43.6
SusWrite 33
38% 50.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 40%
Generic Flash Disk 4GB
3GB free, PID 2096
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 5.2 5.3 5.3 5.2 5.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
3.26% Terrible
Read 10.9
Write 4.2
Mixed 2.7
SusWrite 5.2
7% 5.75 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.26%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
4.49% Terrible
MC Read 0.8
MC Write 1.1
MC Mixed 0.7
2% 0.87 GB/s
SC Read 3.8
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 3.2
10% 3.57 GB/s
Latency 361
11% 361 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 4.49%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProLiant ML110 G4 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP ProLiant ML110 G4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback