Today's hottest deals

Asus P5KPL-AM SE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P5KPL-AM SE  (all builds)
Memory2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100820
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 10 '22 at 21:44
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5300-$59
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
42.9% Average
Memory 72.1
1-Core 42.4
2-Core 86.1
43% 66.9 Pts
4-Core 82.5
8-Core 85.8
11% 84.2 Pts
64-Core 84.7
5% 84.7 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Gigabyte(1458 3549) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.9% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 0.7
2% 1.97 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 2.1
2% 2.43 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.9%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 120GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 65 57 40 33 49 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.8% Poor
Read 128
Write 125
Mixed 114
SusWrite 53.4
24% 105 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 26.8
4K Mixed 15.6
64% 20.8 MB/s
DQ Read 18.5
DQ Write 20.2
DQ Mixed 1.1
6% 13.3 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 88%
Toshiba MQ01ABF032 320GB-$37
124GB free
Firmware: AM001A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 66 62 41 35 49 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 79.9
Write 77.9
Mixed 25.9
SusWrite 54.7
43% 59.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
16.4% Very poor
MC Read 6.1
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 4.4
14% 4.87 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 4.8
14% 4.8 GB/s
Latency 96.7
41% 96.7 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5KPL-AM SE Builds (Compare 406 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5KPL-AM SE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback