Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics15% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory21.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210306
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateAug 05 '21 at 00:18
Run Duration265 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$148
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Memory 68.5
1-Core 151
2-Core 309
92% 176 Pts
4-Core 602
8-Core 1,081
101% 842 Pts
64-Core 1,468
91% 1,468 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 3767) 2GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
15% Very poor
Lighting 18.7
Reflection 18.4
Parallax 19.2
15% 18.8 fps
MRender 15.5
Gravity 19.5
Splatting 17.7
14% 17.6 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS200T2B0A-00SM50 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 399 420 424 426 425 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 483
Write 422
Mixed 350
SusWrite 420
94% 419 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 86.2
4K Mixed 46
161% 56.4 MB/s
DQ Read 201
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 192
144% 192 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 103%
Great: 117%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
514GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 173 172 175 173 174 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 201
Write 138
Mixed 87.4
SusWrite 173
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 107%
Great: 112%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
504GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 124 123 123 123 123 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 119
Write 119
Mixed 65.5
SusWrite 123
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 109%
Seagate Desktop 8TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 040B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 139 138 138 139 141 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 16% Great: 93%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0342
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
23.1% Poor
Read 41
Write 34.1
Mixed 29.6
SusWrite 38.9
26% 35.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 99%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 64GB
28GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 59 37 37 26 24 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
38% Below average
Read 130
Write 61.4
Mixed 56
SusWrite 40.9
85% 72.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 3.1
224% 3.83 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 38%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.7% Good
MC Read 28
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 25.4
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 20.8
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 25.3
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 19: 2R 2G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
19% 30% 23 134 62 60 27.2" 1920 1080 GSM7706 LG HDR 4K
History: Score 6: 1R 0G 1B | Score 19: 2R 2G 3B
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,869 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $888
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback