Today's hottest deals

HP 15 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 16%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics2.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 15 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8015
Memory0.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170113
Uptime12.4 Days
Run DateDec 28 '21 at 23:49
Run Duration260 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Memory 18.5
1-Core 35
2-Core 48.5
20% 34 Pts
4-Core 65.4
8-Core 82.4
10% 73.9 Pts
64-Core 82.7
5% 82.7 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5
HP(103C 8015) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.04% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 4.2
Parallax 3.9
2% 3.47 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 3.8
2% 2.73 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.04%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST9250315AS 250GB-$60
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 3.8 6.8 10 14 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
5.95% Terrible
Read 11.2
Write 25.4
Mixed 2.2
SusWrite 9.3
9% 12 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.1
28% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 5.95%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5673FH0-CH9 M471B5173EB0-YK0 6GB
1333, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
MC Read 4
MC Write 3
MC Mixed 3.6
10% 3.53 GB/s
SC Read 0.9
SC Write 2.5
SC Mixed 4.2
7% 2.53 GB/s
Latency 332
12% 332 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 15 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 3,290 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 15 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback