Today's hottest deals

MSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics95.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive33% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A32
MotherboardMSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32)  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180927
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 26 '21 at 14:56
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Memory 76.2
1-Core 115
2-Core 226
77% 139 Pts
4-Core 397
8-Core 653
64% 525 Pts
64-Core 917
57% 917 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
MSI(1462 C307) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
95.6% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 129
Parallax 119
98% 123 fps
MRender 94.9
Gravity 124
Splatting 111
90% 110 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0105A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 282 211 298 174 133 251 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33% Below average
Read 3.5
Write 4
Mixed 2
SusWrite 225
14% 58.6 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 64.1
4K Mixed 0.6
69% 29 MB/s
DQ Read 27
DQ Write 8.5
DQ Mixed 44.7
26% 26.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33%
Great: 100%
Sandisk S31024G 1TB
334GB free
Firmware: X6107000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 438 456 465 463 470 470 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 408
Mixed 398
SusWrite 460
99% 441 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 69.5
4K Mixed 43.9
144% 49 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 281
230% 328 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 109%
Great: 121%
WD WD7500AZEX-00ZF5A0 750GB
456GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 160 170 150 153 182 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 196
Write 173
Mixed 91.1
SusWrite 160
114% 155 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
250% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 102%
Great: 93%
Garmin nuvi Flash 4GB
2GB free, PID 23cc
Operating at USB 1.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 0.5
Mixed 0.7
1% 0.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0
12% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 0% Great: 2%
Garmin nuvi SD Card 8GB
3GB free, PID 23cc
Operating at USB 1.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
3.53% Terrible
Read 0.5
Write 1
Mixed 0.7
SusWrite 1.1
1% 0.83 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
60% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 0%
This bench: 3.53%
Great: 4%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$33
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 1467 MHz
Performing below potential (81st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
95.5% Outstanding
MC Read 38.9
MC Write 33.6
MC Mixed 32.3
100% 34.9 GB/s
SC Read 25.9
SC Write 31
SC Mixed 27.5
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 88
46% 88 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 10 60 27" 1280 720 SAM0D32 C27F390
Typical X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32) Builds (Compare 1,889 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32) - $155

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 116% - Outstanding Total price: $616
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback