Today's hottest deals

Asrock B450M Pro4-F

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics133% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B450M Pro4-F  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 23 '22 at 04:07
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User ISL-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$90
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Memory 81
1-Core 144
2-Core 264
90% 163 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 802
76% 627 Pts
64-Core 1,024
63% 1,024 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$309
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Lighting 190
Reflection 170
Parallax 160
154% 173 fps
MRender 182
Gravity 135
Splatting 117
115% 145 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 133%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 490
Write 473
Mixed 396
101% 453 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 57.7
196% 70.7 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 360
273% 368 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 115%
Jmicron Generic 240GB
4GB free
Firmware: 0405
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 392
Write 336
Mixed 333
79% 354 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 14.5
4K Mixed 1.2
52% 14.7 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 47.7
63% 116 MB/s
Poor: 36% Great: 69%
Kingston A400 480GB-$35
26GB free
Firmware: SBFKK1B3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 392
Write 446
Mixed 338
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 90.2
4K Mixed 38.2
145% 53.5 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 171
162% 248 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
45GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 117 115 118 119 145 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 152
Write 144
Mixed 82.7
SusWrite 121
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$33
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62.5% Good
MC Read 22.8
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 21.2
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 22
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 21.4
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M Pro4-F Builds (Compare 2,027 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asrock B450M Pro4-F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $348
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback