Today's hottest deals

Acer TravelMate P643-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.01% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive47.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer TravelMate P643-M  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer TravelMate P643-M
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit barev, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131021
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJan 21 '20 at 08:17
Run Duration272 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$230
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
63.3% Good
Memory 88.5
1-Core 68.8
2-Core 136
60% 97.7 Pts
4-Core 208
8-Core 317
32% 262 Pts
64-Core 299
18% 299 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 65%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640M
Acer(1025 0735) 1GB
CLim: 708 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.54
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
6.01% Terrible
Lighting 6.83
Reflection 5.73
Parallax 7.34
6% 6.64 fps
MRender 8
Gravity 8.1
Splatting 8.87
7% 8.32 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.01%
Great: 6%
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Acer(1025 0735) 2GB
Driver: Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.89% Terrible
Lighting 2.07
Reflection 5.46
Parallax 1.38
2% 2.97 fps
MRender 3.05
Gravity 1.13
Splatting 3.83
2% 2.67 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.89%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2016)
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z3311000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 126 134 134 128 134 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 336
Write 124
Mixed 328
SusWrite 135
51% 231 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 33.5
4K Mixed 14.6
58% 20.9 MB/s
DQ Read 62.3
DQ Write 281
DQ Mixed 25.9
62% 123 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 70%
Garmin nuvi Flash 4GB
3GB free, PID 23cc
Operating at USB 1.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 0.3
Mixed 0.3
0% 0.3 MB/s
4K Write 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 0% Great: 2%
Garmin nuvi SD Card 8GB
3GB free, PID 23cc
Operating at USB 1.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.9 0.9 1 1 1 1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
0.27% Terrible
Read 0.5
Write 0.8
Mixed 0.8
SusWrite 0.9
1% 0.75 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.27%
Great: 4%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB HMT451S6MFR8A-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
49.6% Average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 15.6
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 13.6
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TravelMate P643-M Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer TravelMate P643-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $77
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback