Today's hottest deals

Acer, Aspire 5920G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive39.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer, Aspire 5920G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer, Chapala
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110720
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 21 '17 at 16:45
Run Duration2331 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T9500-$160
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
41.4% Average
Memory 71.1
1-Core 37.3
2-Core 70.1
40% 59.5 Pts
4-Core 71.4
8-Core 68.2
9% 69.8 Pts
64-Core 71
4% 71 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 43%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Integral P Series 3 240GB
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 503A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.5% Below average
Read 186
Write 169
Mixed 137
37% 164 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 32.5
4K Mixed 12.7
52% 19.2 MB/s
DQ Read 159
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 36.4
53% 101 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 69%
Garmin nuvi Flash 4GB
0GB free, PID 23cc
Operating at USB 1.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
0.2% Terrible
Read 0.48
Write 0.59
Mixed 0.55
1% 0.54 MB/s
4K Read 0.002
4K Write 0.001
4K Mixed 0.002
0% 0.002 MB/s
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.2%
Great: 2%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
15.4% Very poor
MC Read 5.7
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 4.2
13% 4.6 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 4
12% 4.13 GB/s
Latency 98.9
40% 98.9 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 5920G Builds (Compare 41 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer, Aspire 5920G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 35% - Below average Total price: $180
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $155
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback