bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.08% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive41% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System
MotherboardIntel DX79TO
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120327
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 25 '21 at 21:46
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User LIE-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
60.2% Good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 94.2
2-Core 151
67% 110 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 249
29% 225 Pts
64-Core 259
16% 259 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000D
Nvidia(10DE 0914) 1GB
CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 353.30
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
6.08% Terrible
Lighting 7.1
Reflection 9.4
Parallax 6.8
6% 7.77 fps
MRender 9.5
Gravity 8.2
Splatting 7.1
7% 8.27 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.08%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 330 Series 120GB-$188
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 300i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 85 93 102 78 74 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41% Average
Read 199
Write 95.1
Mixed 149
SusWrite 84.3
29% 132 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 45.2
4K Mixed 22.1
75% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 86.5
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 85.6
68% 93.9 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 41%
Great: 80%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 950GB
885GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 122 123 122 123 123 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Read 148
Write 101
Mixed 44
SusWrite 122
75% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1.2
211% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 142%
disk2go THREEO 16GB
11GB free, PID 0512
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 38 38 38 39 39 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
33.7% Below average
Read 165
Write 38
Mixed 21.6
SusWrite 37.2
66% 65.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.6
43% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x393955353437312D3032302E4130304C46 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1334 MHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
77.2% Very good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 33.4
MC Mixed 30.1
87% 30.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 6.6
25% 8.7 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 44: 6R 3G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
44% 17% 83 44 30 60 27" 1920 1080 PHL08A8 273PLPH
History: Score 7: 0R 2G 1B | Score 44: 6R 3G 5B
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,514 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback