Today's hottest deals

Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory57.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1768 x 992 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 31 '16 at 05:11
Run Duration104 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$280
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 89.6
2-Core 180
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 527
54% 437 Pts
64-Core 671
42% 671 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 4600
Nvidia(10DE 0408) 768MB
Ram: 768MB, Driver: 342.0
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
4.36% Terrible
Lighting 5.47
Reflection 6.92
Parallax 1.94
4% 4.78 fps
MRender 5.71
Gravity 4.33
Splatting 5.22
4% 5.09 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.36%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$96
763GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 00RL
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 416
Write 220
Mixed 139
56% 258 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 65
4K Mixed 18.8
108% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 258
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 37.1
73% 150 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 107%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 950GB
189GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
142% Outstanding
Read 343
Write 153
Mixed 190
171% 229 MB/s
4K Read 0.87
4K Write 2.88
4K Mixed 0.46
141% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 142%
Great: 142%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 213C1 V3 Series 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
91.6% Outstanding
MC Read 37
MC Write 37
MC Mixed 34.6
103% 36.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 11.2
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE IV EXTREME Builds (Compare 1,643 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME - $589

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $1,154
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback