Asus UX370UAR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAsus UX370UAR  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK UX370UAR
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190417
Uptime5.4 Days
Run DateJul 12 '20 at 15:28
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 35%
CPU Throttled 90%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8550U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 0.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Memory 61.6
1-Core 40.2
2-Core 67.9
37% 56.6 Pts
4-Core 97.6
8-Core 109
14% 103 Pts
64-Core 152
9% 152 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Asus(1043 1DC0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7325
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.28% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 1.81
Parallax 0.59
1% 1.23 fps
MRender 2.38
Gravity 1.17
Splatting 2.57
2% 2.04 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.28%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXY7501Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 379 275 298 308 337 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 836
Write 596
Mixed 514
SusWrite 342
128% 572 MB/s
4K Read 40.1
4K Write 57.3
4K Mixed 40.3
143% 45.9 MB/s
DQ Read 264
DQ Write 81.9
DQ Mixed 193
137% 180 MB/s
Poor: 126%
This bench: 106%
Great: 259%
disk2go THREEO 16GB
7GB free, PID 0512
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 14 20 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Read 33.1
Write 3.2
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 19
16% 14.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.2
29% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4EBE304EB-EGCG 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
33.8% Below average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 11.9
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 9.9
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical UX370UAR Builds (Compare 130 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus UX370UAR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback