Today's hottest deals

Packard EasyNote LS11HR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPackard EasyNote LS11HR  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard SJV70_HR
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 04 '22 at 14:33
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$230
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Memory 80.8
1-Core 54.6
2-Core 96.6
50% 77.3 Pts
4-Core 163
8-Core 228
24% 195 Pts
64-Core 66
4% 66 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6630M
Acer(1025 0513) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
4.61% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 6.1
Parallax 5.1
5% 5.73 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 4.7
Splatting 4.8
4% 5 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.61%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 330 Series 120GB-$188
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 300i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 113 115 117 113 116 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 350
Write 130
Mixed 169
SusWrite 116
42% 191 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 41.1
4K Mixed 22.6
79% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 199
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 142
112% 157 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 80%
SMART USB-IBM 8GB
1GB free, PID f100
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 28.7
Write 21.2
Mixed 19.5
28% 23.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.2
45% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 Micron 8JSF25664HZ-1G4D1 Samsung M471B5773CHS-CH9 Samsung M471B5773CHS-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.7% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 14.2
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 13.2
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 79.1
50% 79.1 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EasyNote LS11HR Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Packard EasyNote LS11HR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $222
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback