Today's hottest deals

Packard EasyNote LS11HR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemPackard EasyNote LS11HR  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard SJV70_HR
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 05 '22 at 12:17
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$230
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Memory 75.1
1-Core 52.5
2-Core 103
49% 76.9 Pts
4-Core 171
8-Core 217
25% 194 Pts
64-Core 225
14% 225 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6630M
Acer(1025 0513) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
4.72% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 6.2
Parallax 5.3
5% 5.87 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 5.1
4% 5.2 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.72%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 330 Series 120GB-$188
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 300i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 113 107 109 107 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 326
Write 131
Mixed 173
SusWrite 110
41% 185 MB/s
4K Read 14.6
4K Write 45.1
4K Mixed 21.5
74% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 146
112% 154 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 Micron 8JSF25664HZ-1G4D1 Samsung M471B5773CHS-CH9 Samsung M471B5773CHS-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.7% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 15.1
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 10.7
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 90.1
44% 90.1 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EasyNote LS11HR Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Packard EasyNote LS11HR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $222
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback