Today's hottest deals

Supermicro C7Q67

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics44.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSupermicro C7Q67  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro C7Q67
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 01 '21 at 04:13
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 35%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3330
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
64.7% Good
Memory 86.3
1-Core 64.6
2-Core 130
58% 93.7 Pts
4-Core 245
8-Core 284
34% 264 Pts
64-Core 278
17% 278 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$131
CLim: 1075 MHz, MLim: 1900 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44.8% Average
Lighting 57.7
Reflection 55.4
Parallax 74.2
47% 62.4 fps
MRender 57.9
Gravity 57.2
Splatting 38.1
40% 51.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$64
640GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 67 63 98 107 120 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
39.3% Below average
Read 54.5
Write 44.5
Mixed 38.7
SusWrite 82.4
40% 55 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
117% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 108%
WD WD5002AALX-00J37A0 500GB
46GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 91 90 90 92 91 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 104
Write 100
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 90.4
67% 90.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 72%
SMART USB-IBM 8GB
3GB free, PID f100
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Read 35.3
Write 26
Mixed 25.3
SusWrite 25.8
37% 28.1 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.1
52% 2 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1600 CL9 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.8% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 17.7
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 12.9
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 71
56% 71 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical C7Q67 Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Supermicro C7Q67

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $250
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback