Asrock Z170 Extreme7+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics88.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock Z170 Extreme7+  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160203
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateDec 04 '20 at 22:32
Run Duration381 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 124
2-Core 225
81% 144 Pts
4-Core 397
8-Core 579
61% 488 Pts
64-Core 565
35% 565 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 118
Parallax 108
90% 112 fps
MRender 96.9
Gravity 108
Splatting 106
85% 104 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 2TB-$155
819GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 146 560 343 393 343 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 83% Great: 125%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
533GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 127 128 128 130 129 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 128
Write 112
Mixed 92.1
SusWrite 124
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
198% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 101%
Seagate ST8000VX004-2M11 8TB
2TB free
Firmware: AV01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 221 221 220 223 222 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 26% Great: 100%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
243GB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 90 91 90 91 91 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 99.1
Write 113
Mixed 79.1
SusWrite 89.5
70% 95.3 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.6
260% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 97%
Lacie P9233 8TB
1TB free
Firmware: 1053
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 134 136 138 139 136 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 98.4
Write 99.2
Mixed 78.1
SusWrite 135
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.5
216% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 92%
JMicron Generic DISK05 4TB
243GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25% Poor
Read 111
Write 102
Mixed 79.9
SusWrite 26.4
102% 79.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
57% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25%
Great: 66%
JMicron Generic DISK07 4TB
272GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 27 27 26 27 31 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.5% Poor
Read 105
Write 85.9
Mixed 74.7
SusWrite 27.6
93% 73.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
57% 0.73 MB/s
JMicron Generic DISK03 4TB
439GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 27 27 27 27 33 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
29.6% Poor
Read 138
Write 104
Mixed 85.1
SusWrite 27.9
110% 88.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
63% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 53%
JMicron Generic DISK04 4TB
559GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
29% Poor
Read 136
Write 133
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 26.5
119% 93.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
60% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 29%
Great: 64%
JMicron Generic DISK02 3TB
255GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Read 138
Write 95.5
Mixed 86.6
SusWrite 26.6
107% 86.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 65%
JMicron Generic DISK06 4TB
291GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.3% Poor
Read 134
Write 99
Mixed 82.3
SusWrite 26.4
106% 85.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
57% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 28%
JMicron Generic DISK00 4TB
468GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
31.2% Below average
Read 140
Write 127
Mixed 85.2
SusWrite 26.6
119% 94.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 73%
WD Elements 25A3 12TB
7.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 175 173 166 169 176 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Read 160
Write 172
Mixed 129
SusWrite 170
216% 158 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 6.9
4K Mixed 1.1
290% 4.3 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 100%
JMicron Generic DISK01 8TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 180 181 182 182 183 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Read 228
Write 204
Mixed 141
SusWrite 172
246% 186 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 1.2
241% 6.4 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 91%
Generic MassStorageClass 129GB
32GB free, PID 0749
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 22 20 21 20 21 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
19% Very poor
Read 78.7
Write 20.7
Mixed 28.6
SusWrite 20.4
41% 37.1 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
56% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 19%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3000C15-8GVRB 0420 F4-3000C15-8GVR 0420 F4-3000C15-8GVRB 0420 F4-3000C15-8GVR 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
66% Good
MC Read 24.5
MC Write 25.1
MC Mixed 20.1
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 20.5
58% 20.1 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 66%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170 Extreme7+ Builds (Compare 193 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asrock Z170 Extreme7+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $564
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback