Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z170 Extreme7+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics93.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z170 Extreme7+  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160203
Uptime18.5 Days
Run DateOct 14 '20 at 13:54
Run Duration302 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$85
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
77.4% Very good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 124
2-Core 225
82% 144 Pts
4-Core 379
8-Core 636
62% 507 Pts
64-Core 637
39% 637 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.38
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 124
Parallax 117
96% 119 fps
MRender 101
Gravity 107
Splatting 109
87% 106 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
682GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 108 127 127 131 132 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Read 138
Write 130
Mixed 82.9
SusWrite 124
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
212% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 101%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$61
245GB free
Firmware: CC52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 123 131 132 132 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 114
Write 96.2
Mixed 64
SusWrite 128
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 96%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$61
187GB free
Firmware: CC52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 91 98 97 97 94 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 110
Write 111
Mixed 61.7
SusWrite 95
69% 94.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 96%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$61
379GB free
Firmware: CC52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 128 129 130 132 126 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Read 128
Write 118
Mixed 66.5
SusWrite 129
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
116% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 96%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$21
280GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 113 137 149 150 149 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 94.7
Write 150
Mixed 32.6
SusWrite 136
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2
368% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 108%
Seagate ST8000VX004-2M11 8TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: AV01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 130 138 140 140 140 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 26% Great: 100%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
178GB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 165 164 164 166 166 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 87.9
Write 118
Mixed 87.1
SusWrite 160
84% 113 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.6
243% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 97%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$61
232GB free
Firmware: CC52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 130 137 139 139 139 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
74.9% Very good
Read 127
Write 100
Mixed 65.9
SusWrite 134
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
114% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 96%
Lacie P9233 8TB
457GB free
Firmware: 1053
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 170 173 174 170 173 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 62.2
Write 79.1
Mixed 73.3
SusWrite 171
71% 96.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.5
193% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 92%
Seagate SkyHawk 8TB (2016)-$170
287GB free
Firmware: AV01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 218 215 155 121 136 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 41% Great: 102%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 3.0 32GB
28GB free, PID 5597
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 12 14 15 14 15 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Read 114
Write 31.8
Mixed 23.9
SusWrite 12.7
46% 45.6 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 2.9
191% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 27%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB
255GB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0.1 1.1 42 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 41.9
Write 39.2
Mixed 31
SusWrite 7.1
38% 29.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
60% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 18%
ST3000DM 001-1CH166 3TB
210GB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 5.3 5 4.9 4.9 4.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 41.6
Write 40
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 5
39% 30.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 18%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB
309GB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 41.1
Write 36.3
Mixed 31.3
SusWrite 0.1
34% 27.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 18%
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB
223GB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
20.6% Poor
Read 39.6
Write 42
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 37.7
52% 38.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
101% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3000C15-8GVRB 0420 F4-3000C15-8GVR 0420 F4-3000C15-8GVRB 0420 F4-3000C15-8GVR 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
65.6% Good
MC Read 24.1
MC Write 25.1
MC Mixed 20.1
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 21.3
56% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170 Extreme7+ Builds (Compare 193 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asrock Z170 Extreme7+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $483
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback