Today's hottest deals

HP ProLiant MicroServer

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive29.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProLiant MicroServer  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory6.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110729
Uptime7.9 Days
Run DateApr 25 '17 at 22:54
Run Duration408 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Turion II Neo N54L
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
40.9% Average
Memory 71.3
1-Core 23.6
2-Core 65
36% 53.3 Pts
4-Core 64.8
8-Core 64.9
9% 64.9 Pts
64-Core 64.9
4% 64.9 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 41%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 605ABBF2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
29.5% Poor
Read 162
Write 122
Mixed 118
30% 134 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 22.1
4K Mixed 10.8
45% 15.2 MB/s
DQ Read 23.1
DQ Write 64.7
DQ Mixed 8.01
16% 32 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$91
2TB free
Firmware: CC25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 146
Mixed 49.9
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.23
78% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
284GB free
Firmware: CC24 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Read 151
Write 159
Mixed 67.9
93% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.28
4K Mixed 0.26
74% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 114%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
277GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
45.4% Average
Read 98
Write 60.3
Mixed 5.21
39% 54.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.25
4K Mixed 0.16
62% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$91
10GB free
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
21.2% Poor
Read 31
Write 42.9
Mixed 52.2
32% 42 MB/s
4K Read 0.31
4K Write 0.81
4K Mixed 0.16
46% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 113%
ST3000DM 001-1ER166 3TB
2TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 127
Write 150
Mixed 24.7
122% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.22
68% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 69%
ST3000DM 001-1ER166 3TB
468GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 130
Write 138
Mixed 124
169% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 1.65
4K Mixed 0.25
68% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 69%
ST3000DM 001-1ER166 3TB
216GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 109
Write 104
Mixed 105
136% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.73
4K Write 1.61
4K Mixed 0.23
65% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 69%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB
1GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
15% Very poor
Read 33.4
Write 32.7
Mixed 23.1
37% 29.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 0.97
4K Mixed 0.17
40% 0.49 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 8.3
22% 7.6 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6.4
17% 5.87 GB/s
Latency 98.4
41% 98.4 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 23%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProLiant MicroServer Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProLiant MicroServer

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $112
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback