Today's hottest deals

Asus X99-DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics54.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus X99-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory15 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160818
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 20 '17 at 16:35
Run Duration399 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Memory 94.7
1-Core 114
2-Core 244
85% 151 Pts
4-Core 518
8-Core 858
84% 688 Pts
64-Core 1,080
67% 1,080 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 376.9
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Lighting 69.1
Reflection 67.5
Parallax 67.1
56% 67.9 fps
MRender 73.7
Gravity 63.6
Splatting 55
51% 64.1 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
311GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 72% Great: 126%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$99
180GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Read 502
Write 347
Mixed 357
89% 402 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 52.7
4K Mixed 24.1
112% 37.3 MB/s
DQ Read 292
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 76.5
102% 188 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 118%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$99
37GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 346
Mixed 351
89% 401 MB/s
4K Read 40
4K Write 64.8
4K Mixed 26.2
128% 43.6 MB/s
DQ Read 357
DQ Write 223
DQ Mixed 82.7
117% 221 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 118%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
349GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 105
Write 97.9
Mixed 95.9
75% 99.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.99
4K Write 2.39
4K Mixed 0.5
141% 1.29 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 76%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
546GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Read 125
Write 121
Mixed 121
92% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.08
4K Write 2.43
4K Mixed 0.43
138% 1.31 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 76%
WD Black 500GB (2008)-$95
154GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
52% Above average
Read 96.7
Write 84.1
Mixed 75.2
64% 85.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.79
4K Write 1.96
4K Mixed 0.38
112% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 52%
Great: 69%
WD Black 500GB (2008)-$95
344GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
37.4% Below average
Read 72.2
Write 57.7
Mixed 62
48% 64 MB/s
4K Read 0.73
4K Write 1.83
4K Mixed 0.36
104% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 69%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 128
Write 128
Mixed 101
150% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.09
4K Write 1.94
4K Mixed 0.18
76% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 53%
ST2000DX 001-1CM164 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 179
Write 135
Mixed 75.2
152% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.74
4K Write 5.54
4K Mixed 0.65
213% 2.31 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 81%
WDC WD10 02FAEX-00Y9A0 1TB
854GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 119
Write 103
Mixed 84.2
127% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.23
4K Write 2.49
4K Mixed 0.37
102% 1.36 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 48%
WDC WD10 02FAEX-00Y9A0 1TB
400GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 105
Write 117
Mixed 86
132% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 2.44
4K Mixed 0.31
96% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 48%
WDC WD10 02FAEX-00Y9A0 1TB
144GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 105
Write 99.1
Mixed 69.6
114% 91.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.04
4K Write 2.56
4K Mixed 0.36
103% 1.32 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSA.M16FA 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
133% Outstanding
MC Read 51.6
MC Write 57.2
MC Mixed 47.2
149% 52 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 24.7
SC Mixed 25.1
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 58
69% 58 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 133%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,965 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE - $349

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $874
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback