PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 2.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 38.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP ProLiant MicroServer (all builds) |
Motherboard | |
Memory | 2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20131001 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jul 24 '18 at 05:52 |
Run Duration | 175 Seconds |
Run User | ZAF-User |
Background CPU | 5% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Turion II Neo N54L
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
|
40.7%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GeForce GT 520
MSI(1462 2630) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
|
2.05%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 113 115 119 118 121 MB/s
|
38.3%
Below average
|
|||
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$50
902GB free
Firmware: 01.01V01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 128 128 130 131 130 MB/s
|
78.8%
Very good
|
|||
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$50
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01V01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 126 128 130 131 130 MB/s
|
76.6%
Very good
|
|||
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$50
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01V01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 125 128 129 131 131 MB/s
|
76.9%
Very good
|
|||
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$50
434GB free
Firmware: 01.01V01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 101 103 104 104 104 MB/s
|
65.5%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
16.9%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Turion II Neo N40LAMDBench 29%, 169 samples | 9x |
Turion II Neo N54LAMDBench 35%, 191 samples | 4x |
Athlon II Neo N36L Dual-CoreAMDBench 30%, 91 samples | 2x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Mobility Radeon HD 4250ATIBench 1%, 11,054 samples | 4x |
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 2x |
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 32% - Below average | Total price: $112 |