Today's hottest deals

HP ProLiant MicroServer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP ProLiant MicroServer  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131001
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 24 '18 at 05:52
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Turion II Neo N54L
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
40.7% Average
Memory 71.1
1-Core 32.1
2-Core 63.9
38% 55.7 Pts
4-Core 62.4
8-Core 65
8% 63.7 Pts
64-Core 63
4% 63 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 520
MSI(1462 2630) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
2.05% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 3.08
Parallax 1.94
2% 2.5 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 2.33
Splatting 2.26
2% 2.56 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.05%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 113 115 119 118 121 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.3% Below average
Read 173
Write 146
Mixed 159
SusWrite 114
33% 148 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 46
4K Mixed 19.8
72% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 26
DQ Write 75.8
DQ Mixed 32
30% 44.6 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 82%
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$50
902GB free
Firmware: 01.01V01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 128 128 130 131 130 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 146
Write 126
Mixed 87.3
SusWrite 128
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
224% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 76%
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$50
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01V01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 126 128 130 131 130 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Read 139
Write 122
Mixed 94.3
SusWrite 128
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
209% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 76%
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$50
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01V01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 125 128 129 131 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Read 140
Write 128
Mixed 80.8
SusWrite 128
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
240% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 76%
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$50
434GB free
Firmware: 01.01V01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 101 103 104 104 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 125
Write 108
Mixed 85.4
SusWrite 103
78% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
224% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
16.9% Very poor
MC Read 5.7
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 5
14% 5.03 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 5.5
15% 5.27 GB/s
Latency 98.8
40% 98.8 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProLiant MicroServer Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProLiant MicroServer

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $112
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback