Today's hottest deals

HP Z2 Tower G4 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics45.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive227% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Z2 Tower G4 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8455
Memory59.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200608
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 17 '20 at 19:14
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700-$245
CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Memory 80.3
1-Core 150
2-Core 301
95% 177 Pts
4-Core 590
8-Core 1,121
102% 855 Pts
64-Core 1,116
69% 1,116 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$152
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
45.7% Average
Lighting 59.2
Reflection 56
Parallax 54.8
48% 56.7 fps
MRender 45.6
Gravity 51.8
Splatting 51.2
41% 49.5 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GB
397GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA73H1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1215 1266 607 609 607 607 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
227% Outstanding
Read 853
Write 1,125
Mixed 751
SusWrite 819
200% 887 MB/s
4K Read 60.2
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 78.5
264% 91.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,564
DQ Write 1164
DQ Mixed 1,307
993% 1,345 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 227%
Great: 295%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$30
586GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 170 170 171 171 171 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 77.5
Mixed 69.9
SusWrite 167
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 113%
External USB3.0 DISK00 1.5TB
849GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 7.2 0.4 0 0 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
20.6% Poor
Read 101
Write 108
Mixed 68.2
SusWrite 4
89% 70.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 59%
External USB3.0 DISK01 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 187 188 188 187 183 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
76% Very good
Read 212
Write 179
Mixed 106
SusWrite 178
222% 169 MB/s
4K Read 9.1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1.1
119% 3.87 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 76%
Great: 76%
External USB3.0 DISK02 2TB
305GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 192 188 188 187 184 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 90.8
Write 54.5
Mixed 66.5
SusWrite 179
136% 97.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 67%
External USB3.0 DISK03 2TB
313GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 0.1 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
34.5% Below average
Read 189
Write 136
Mixed 84.8
SusWrite 5.3
122% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2K43CB1-CTD 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
MC Read 31.9
MC Write 37
MC Mixed 30.6
95% 33.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 38.1
SC Mixed 29.2
82% 28.7 GB/s
Latency 79.9
50% 79.9 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z2 Tower G4 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,361 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

System: HP Z2 Tower G4 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $145
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback