Today's hottest deals

Asus P7P55D PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P7P55D PRO  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090903
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 24 '21 at 23:18
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Memory 87.5
1-Core 80.5
2-Core 161
66% 110 Pts
4-Core 298
8-Core 396
44% 347 Pts
64-Core 400
25% 400 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9600 GT
Asus(1043 82A2) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.74
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
4.16% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 10.7
Parallax 1.5
4% 5.73 fps
MRender 8.6
Gravity 4
Splatting 4
4% 5.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.16%
Great: 5%
Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS
Asus(1043 82B2) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.74
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 0.8
0% 0.8 fps
Splatting 0.6
1% 0.6 fps
Poor: 0% Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD740HLFS-01G6U0 74GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04.04V02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 99 101 106 104 72 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
58% Above average
Read 107
Write 108
Mixed 75.1
SusWrite 94.8
71% 96.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
210% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 58%
Great: 70%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
905GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 85 82 85 85 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 78.1
Write 58.9
Mixed 57.8
SusWrite 83.6
51% 69.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 51%
WD WD740HLFS-01G6U0 74GB
66GB free
Firmware: 04.04V02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 85 82 85 85 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 117
Write 119
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 83.6
73% 98.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 70%
External USB3.0 DISK00 1.5TB
779GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 2.1 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Read 32.7
Write 31.8
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 5.8
32% 24.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 59%
External USB3.0 DISK01 1TB
931GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 20 29 29 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Read 32.7
Write 32.3
Mixed 27.8
SusWrite 27.8
41% 30.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 67%
External USB3.0 DISK03 320GB
43GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 3.7 2.6 3.7 3.7 3.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Read 32.4
Write 31.1
Mixed 25.9
SusWrite 3.5
30% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.2
159% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 46%
External USB3.0 DISK04 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0.1 0.1 0 0 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
7.6% Terrible
Read 28.1
Write 31.7
Mixed 28.4
SusWrite 0
29% 22.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
67% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.6%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
41.9% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 13.1
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 12.1
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7P55D PRO Builds (Compare 327 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $314
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback