Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition (Early 2020) - RZ09-033

Performance Results


Gaming 83% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 74% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	92.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	264% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition (Early 2020) - RZ09-033 (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer CH551
Memory	52.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200720
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 27 '21 at 10:42
Run Duration	259 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10875H 35,361 User benchmarks, average bench 79% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	84.9% Excellent	Memory 88.4 1-Core 136 2-Core 256 89% 160 Pts	4-Core 438 8-Core 659 68% 549 Pts	64-Core 898 56% 898 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 84.9% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design 562 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Device(1A58 200A) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6140 Performing below potential (57^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	92.2% Outstanding	Lighting 111 Reflection 139 Parallax 122 90% 124 fps	MRender 147 Gravity 103 Splatting 108 96% 119 fps
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 92.2% Great: 102%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-00A00 1TB 2,748 User benchmarks, average bench 254% 336GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXF7201Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 1202 1117 1152 1170 1157 1126 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	264% Outstanding	Read 2,072 Write 1,707 Mixed 1583 SusWrite 1154 365% 1,629 MB/s	4K Read 55.9 4K Write 117 4K Mixed 71.7 239% 81.7 MB/s	DQ Read 922 DQ Write 711 DQ Mixed 815 610% 816 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 264% Great: 329%
SABRENT 960GB 123 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 154GB free Firmware: 2210 SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 292 289 296 292 291 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	52.7% Above average	Read 248 Write 299 Mixed 177 SusWrite 293 57% 254 MB/s	4K Read 17.3 4K Write 29.3 4K Mixed 20.9 68% 22.5 MB/s	DQ Read 66.6 DQ Write 89 DQ Mixed 78.7 59% 78.1 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 74%
SABRENT 1TB 2,168 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 391GB free Firmware: 0208 SusWrite @10s intervals: 551 514 527 544 562 544 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 22% Great: 87%
Seagate ST10000NM001G-2MW103 10TB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 6.5TB free Firmware: 0102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 52 53 49 53 53 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	29.4% Poor	Read 50.2 Write 56.5 Mixed 38.7 SusWrite 51.7 36% 49.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 1.1 215% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 113%
External USB3.0 DISK00 1.5TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 176 177 187 183 187 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	58.6% Above average	Read 126 Write 73.7 Mixed 61.3 SusWrite 181 148% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.3 22% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 59%
TRUSTED Mass Storage 17.5TB 307 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 9TB free, PID 4d10 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 0.8 0.8 1.1 2.8 3.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	3.55% Terrible	Read 18.5 Write 0.5 Mixed 2 SusWrite 1.6 5% 5.65 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 10% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 3.55% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905744-066.A00G 2x31.5GB 177 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2 of 2 slots used 63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	86.3% Excellent	MC Read 31.2 MC Write 35.3 MC Mixed 26.3 88% 30.9 GB/s	SC Read 16.7 SC Write 38 SC Mixed 22.3 73% 25.7 GB/s	Latency 69.1 58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 86.3% Great: 105%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade 15 Studio Edition (Early 2020) - RZ09-033 Builds (Compare 137 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 76%

Battleship

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 71%

Battleship

System: Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition (Early 2020) - RZ09-033

CPU
Core i7-10875HIntelBench 79%, 35,361 samples	137x

GPU
Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q DesignNvidiaBench 90%, 562 samples	68x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	64x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $350Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	2x

SSD
CA5-8D1024 1TBNvmeBench 181%, 641 samples	43x
MZVLB1T0HBLR-00A00 1TBSamsungBench 254%, 2,748 samples	43x
MZVLB1T0HBLR-00000 1TBSamsungBench 275%, 9,396 samples	16x

RAM
M471A2K43DB1-CWE 2x16GBSamsungBench 91%, 15,521 samples	99x
16ATF2G64HZ-3G2J1 2x16GBMicronBench 88%, 2,294 samples	9x
M471A2K43EB1-CWE 2x16GBSamsungBench 87%, 6,443 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353