Today's hottest deals

Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-033

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive153% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
SystemRazer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-033  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer CH551
Memory4.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200416
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 08 '23 at 13:01
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 61%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10875H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Memory 70.8
1-Core 68.5
2-Core 146
56% 95.1 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 246
32% 239 Pts
64-Core 352
22% 352 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1A58 200A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8476
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
4.86% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 92.7
Parallax 6.3
5% 34.9 fps
MRender 4.8
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 8.4
5% 6.37 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.86%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-00A00 1TB
292GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXF7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 819 866 1064 760 1156 1073 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
153% Outstanding
Read 1,040
Write 1,154
Mixed 714
SusWrite 956
218% 966 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 55.5
4K Mixed 24.6
102% 35.7 MB/s
DQ Read 638
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 516
380% 506 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 153%
Great: 329%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM DDR4 3200 C22 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
21.9% Poor
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 6
21% 7.27 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 6.2
15% 5.33 GB/s
Latency 99.5
40% 99.5 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-033 Builds (Compare 1,360 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-033

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback